VRSC Models V-Rod, Street Rod, Night Rod and Night Rod Special

Why rubber mounted engine?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 10-17-2007, 03:27 PM
TowJam's Avatar
TowJam
TowJam is offline
Road Warrior
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,751
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Why rubber mounted engine?

Just out of curiousity... Any ideas why HD chose to rubber mount the engine even though it's counterbalanced? Conventional wisdom is that a solid mounted engine will provide a more rigid chassis and thus, better handling. (I'm assuming that at the very least, the VR doesn't suffer the same rear end "wallow" that the Dynas and Baggers are famous for. Correct me if I'm wrong.)
 
  #2  
Old 10-17-2007, 04:03 PM
eazy's Avatar
eazy
eazy is offline
Road Warrior
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,772
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: Why rubber mounted engine?

Way less transmitted vibration. TheRevolution wings around at 9000 rather than the 5500 or so of the air-cooled bikes, so the vibration one would feel with the same mounting would be nearly double. Imagine the vibration you feel and then multiply it by 163%, it's shake itself to pieces. With a double backbone and all major frame rails of 1 1/2" tubing, combined with less weld joints in the frame, there isn't near the flex that the air-cooled bikes have either. You can barely see the frame in your bike in your signature picture but mine is very apparent.
 
  #3  
Old 10-17-2007, 04:17 PM
TowJam's Avatar
TowJam
TowJam is offline
Road Warrior
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,751
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: Why rubber mounted engine?

ORIGINAL: eazy

Way less transmitted vibration. TheRevolution wings around at 9000 rather than the 5500 or so of the air-cooled bikes, so the vibration one would feel with the same mounting would be nearly double. Imagine the vibration you feel and then multiply it by 163%, it's shake itself to pieces. With a double backbone and all major frame rails of 1 1/2" tubing, combined with less weld joints in the frame, there isn't near the flex that the air-cooled bikes have either. You can barely see the frame in your bike in your signature picture but mine is very apparent.
I don't doubt that the rubber mounting further isolates vibration, but with the counterbalancers, engine vibration should be negligible compared to the unbalanced TC engine. Note that the new Buell - with a redline of 10,500 is rigid mounted as are the majority of counterbalanced engines in the metric bikes.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tim74
Shovelhead
3
10-12-2016 11:03 PM
89FLHTC
EVO
29
04-29-2016 05:37 PM
hoethree
General Harley Davidson Chat
108
02-27-2012 11:30 AM
Dyna-Asa
Dyna Glide Models
9
06-14-2009 12:42 PM
py-r8
Engine Mechanical Topics
0
12-06-2008 10:30 PM



Quick Reply: Why rubber mounted engine?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:26 PM.