I tend to agree with harpwrench but getting to 107" a different way; think about an all bore 107. Case boring is required for the 4.125" cylinders and the crank should be trued and balanced which is cheaper than a new 4.375" crank. An all bore 107" motor is pretty torquey and they spool up fast. Not many here run them but a couple have; Max is runnng one now and I think he likes it. I think the S&S 585 could work as well at your current throttle body. Worth a look? JMHO
I love it.. It don't make as much HP up top as my 116 stoker did, The midrange and low end torque seem stronger but then it's got a Woods 9b cam and 11 to 1 CR.. The 116 had 11.3 to 1 and SnS625 cam. Unfortunately the 116 broke the rear rod and motor cases.. The 107 was built with the original 4 inch crank, 01 engine cases, Advanced Sleeve/Stock Cylinders. Used the same heads, intake and exhaust.
Heard of it a lot.. Look at the x axis.. I doubt the motor is spinning 22000 RPM... Dyno jets measure HP not TQ. Tq is calculated from the HP reading.
The graph I don't understand, actually the RPM scale...but I wasn't talking about that.. I was referring about the issue that @djl could not see the pictures the OP posted in post 29.. So I downloaded them and sent them with a private message.. Maybe he'll see them then and he'll understand what he missed..
The graph I don't understand, actually the RPM scale...but I wasn't talking about that.. I was referring about the issue that @djl could not see the pictures the OP posted in post 29.. So I downloaded them and sent them with a private message.. Maybe he'll see them then and he'll understand what he missed..
Got the PM with image icons but won't open for me and those image icons did not appear in the OPs post wherein the images were supposed to be. I don't know what the issue is.
Got the PM with image icons but won't open for me and those image icons did not appear in the OPs post wherein the images were supposed to be. I don't know what the issue is.
It’s just a couple pics of the bike and a really terrible dyno pic of current build, ie the rpm axis is not in traditional viewing style and no Tq on graph…trust me you haven’t missed much.
It’s just a couple pics of the bike and a really terrible dyno pic of current build, ie the rpm axis is not in traditional viewing style and no Tq on graph…trust me you haven’t missed much.