Twin Cam Motors Twin Cam 1998 thru 2017

Mild 117 build cam

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #21  
Old 11-24-2023, 08:59 AM
Max Headflow's Avatar
Max Headflow
Max Headflow is offline
Seasoned HDF Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: poway
Posts: 17,227
Received 6,016 Likes on 4,064 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pawhite
My 79cc head’s currently have 1.940” intake and 1.575” exhaust and 0.650” springs and work superb with my S&S 585 cams and 97” big bore. The plan was to cc them to get required comp ratio required for the 117 upgrade.

I could just cc them and leave the valve size as the flow is spot on as designed for a cam with approximately 585 lift, that is, if you go off the theory that intake valve lift should be approx 25-30 percent of valve diameter…

or will I need bigger valves because of the extra cubes?

S&S recommend these heads upto 88” to 110” motors but I think that’s to do with chamber size more so than valve size?
In the original post you wrote that you had 89 cc heads. Which heads do you have? Do you know what they flow?
 
  #22  
Old 11-24-2023, 09:05 AM
98hotrodfatboy's Avatar
98hotrodfatboy
98hotrodfatboy is offline
Seasoned HDF Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Poolville
Posts: 18,316
Received 5,466 Likes on 3,643 Posts
  #23  
Old 11-24-2023, 09:06 AM
harpwrench's Avatar
harpwrench
harpwrench is offline
Tourer
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: NW MO
Posts: 289
Received 169 Likes on 118 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pawhite
My 79cc head’s currently have 1.940” intake and 1.575” exhaust and 0.650” springs and work superb with my S&S 585 cams and 97” big bore. The plan was to cc them to get required comp ratio required for the 117 upgrade.

I could just cc them and leave the valve size as the flow is spot on as designed for a cam with approximately 585 lift, that is, if you go off the theory that intake valve lift should be approx 25-30 percent of valve diameter…

or will I need bigger valves because of the extra cubes?

S&S recommend these heads upto 88” to 110” motors but I think that’s to do with chamber size more so than valve size?

Your original post says 89cc S&S heads, are you now saying you already have 79cc S&S heads on it and are planning to use those?
 
The following users liked this post:
Max Headflow (11-24-2023)
  #24  
Old 11-24-2023, 11:01 AM
pawhite's Avatar
pawhite
pawhite is offline
Intermediate
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: Cornwall
Posts: 29
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Yes my original post says 89cc S&S heads but I didn’t make myself clear from the get go, so here it is:

The bike is an 05 Dyna Superglide custom, I’m currently running:
S&S 97” kit
S&S 79cc heads (with the 0.650” lift springs)
S&S 585s chain
S&S hyd camplate & upgraded pump
S&S premium Quickee pushrods & tappets
06 up TB bored to 50mm with 4.9 injectors
Bassani Road Rage II B1 Power
3.37 gearing
Baker OD6
Barnet scorpion lockup clutch
According to BigBoyz calculator it’s at 10.33 static & corrected 9.27

Chain conversion
Lyndal twin disk setup up front
Lyndal rear
Legends carts up front, ohlins rear shocks
Metmachex Aluminium Swingarm
Lithium battery
Cast 13 spoke wheels (powder coated)
Turns out 109hp and 108tq

I’ve done all these mods myself, it was bone stock when I got her and you don’t need to be a genius to understand how heavily invested I am in this machine.

The original plan was to reuse the heads and cc them to 89cc.
Use a -10cc piston with 117 S&S cylinders and a 0.030 gasket to get 10:1 static.
Use an Andrew’s 57, 54 or woods 6G cam.
Use my exhaust.
Use my current 50mm TB and 4.9 injectors for what would be a ‘mild 117’….

Now after hearing lots of good info, I’ve been persuaded to avoid this ‘original plan’ and perhaps look at re-using my 585s and up the comp to 10.5 (by using flat tops and adjusting head cc’s in order to accommodate my 585s. Use the money I’ve saved by not replacing cams and invest that in a HPI 55/58 or similar…

Now the question remains can I use these S&S 79cc heads by just cc’ing them to my required 10.5 or will I need a valve job too? Or should I put ‘em on the shelf and grab some oem heads to modify?
I would prefer to reuse them as it would be wasteful not to.

Apologies for not being clear at the start, in my excuse, I was initially only asking for cam advice.
So there you have it…

 

Last edited by pawhite; 11-24-2023 at 12:10 PM.
The following users liked this post:
Max Headflow (11-24-2023)
  #25  
Old 11-24-2023, 11:11 AM
djl's Avatar
djl
djl is offline
HDF Community Team
Veteran: Army
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: san antonio
Posts: 12,252
Received 2,227 Likes on 1,611 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by downzero
That might work down at sea level where you can buy 93 octane from the pump, but c'mon out here into the west where it's hot as hell and I don't think you'll be telling people to run 11:1 compression on air cooled engines when it's 120 degrees outside on 91 octane. I'm not saying your advice to go bigger on a cam in a bigger displacement engine is a bad idea, but there is nothing old fashioned about telling people to not get ridiculous with camshaft and compression when they want reliability; any credible engine builder will be telling people that.
Check out post #6. South Texas, not 120* but can see 108*-110* late summer. 93 octane, no issue with detonation, hard hot starts, etc. but it was tuned by one of the best in Texas, probably one of the best nationwide. Not trying to start an argument, just pointing out that high compression motors can have good street manners and avoid high heat issues with the right tune.
 
  #26  
Old 11-24-2023, 11:17 AM
djl's Avatar
djl
djl is offline
HDF Community Team
Veteran: Army
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: san antonio
Posts: 12,252
Received 2,227 Likes on 1,611 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pawhite
Now the question remains can I use these S&S 79cc heads by just cc’ing them to my required 10.5 or will I need a valve job too? Or should I put ‘em on the shelf and grab some oem heads to modify? I would prefer to reuse them as it would be wasteful not to.
As has been suggested more than once, sell the S&S heads and use the funds to purchase a set of OEM heads, preferably '06 up but since going out for porting and machine work (compression releases) the year really doesn't matter. Select a head porter, WFO Larry has been mentioned, give him a call (he will have good advice on cam selection as well) tell him your plan and turn him loose on your heads.

How about posting a couple of pics of the bike; I would like to see it.
 

Last edited by djl; 11-24-2023 at 11:45 AM.
  #27  
Old 11-24-2023, 11:36 AM
pawhite's Avatar
pawhite
pawhite is offline
Intermediate
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: Cornwall
Posts: 29
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 98hotrodfatboy
Thanks for these links, I’ve plugged my dimensions into the calculator and I can see that my current valve sizes are a touch too small for absolute maximum VE at 6000rpm, @ 5800 it just tips over the 0.6 inlet valve MACH index.
Great help 👍
 
  #28  
Old 11-24-2023, 11:53 AM
Max Headflow's Avatar
Max Headflow
Max Headflow is offline
Seasoned HDF Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: poway
Posts: 17,227
Received 6,016 Likes on 4,064 Posts
Default

Now the question remains can I use these S&S 79cc heads by just cc’ing them to my required 10.5 or will I need a valve job too? Or should I put ‘em on the shelf and grab some oem heads to modify?
Give WFO Larry a call.. I'll bet he'll have some suggestions..
 
  #29  
Old 11-24-2023, 12:00 PM
pawhite's Avatar
pawhite
pawhite is offline
Intermediate
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: Cornwall
Posts: 29
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by djl
As has been suggested more than once, sell the S&S heads and use the funds to purchase a set of OEM heads, preferably '06 up but since going out for porting and machine work (compression releases) the year really doesn't matter. Select a head porter, WFO Larry has been mentioned, give him a call (he will have good advice on cam selection as well) tell him your plan and turn him loose on your heads.

How about posting a couple of pics of the bike; I would like to see it.




This is my latest one, No Tq in this one as the dyno guy had some issues with leads on the day?? but he assured me it was 108.69.
 
  #30  
Old 11-24-2023, 12:31 PM
harpwrench's Avatar
harpwrench
harpwrench is offline
Tourer
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: NW MO
Posts: 289
Received 169 Likes on 118 Posts
Default

I think in the UK you might be better off doing a very responsive 107 than diving into a 117 rabbit hole.
 


Quick Reply: Mild 117 build cam



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:26 PM.