dyno tune question
#21
05-30-2014 | 01:52 AM
Grand HDF Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,858
Likes: 572
From: bklyn,ny
Oh yeah.......
#22
05-30-2014 | 05:55 AM
Supporter
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,196
Likes: 9
From: Shenandoah, TX
I had cams and head work done on my bike with the TTS tuner. My indy referred me to a tuner that he knew that can tune the bike with his laptop. He tried three times to get it right. I road from just North of Houston to Dallas for a dyno tune. After the tune, there was 11 more hp and 10 lb tq more. Enough to make a world of difference. Get it dynoed.
#23
05-30-2014 | 11:59 AM
Thread Starter
|
6th Gear
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin
#24
06-03-2014 | 08:50 PM
Then the tune's not right. Which is why it's not really smart to trust a tune from a stranger on the internet who hasn't developed the tune on a dyno.
Remember, there's much more to a tune than the peak numbers.
I'm curious to see what your thoughts are on the difference in feel.
Remember, there's much more to a tune than the peak numbers.
I'm curious to see what your thoughts are on the difference in feel.
So here's the numbers before and after:
75.2hp@ 5360rpm & 92.4ft-lbs@ 2721rpm
VS
79.5hp@ 5293rpm & 100.7ft-lbs@ 2824rpm
Throttle response is much more crisp. I also was getting popping when starting but that is gone. Idle is very smooth as well.
What do you guys think?
#25
06-03-2014 | 09:18 PM
Road Master
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 992
Likes: 2
From: TN
Results are in......tuner said the canned map I had really wasn't that bad but it was to rich and was breaking up.
So here's the numbers before and after:
75.2hp@ 5360rpm & 92.4ft-lbs@ 2721rpm
VS
79.5hp@ 5293rpm & 100.7ft-lbs@ 2824rpm
Throttle response is much more crisp. I also was getting popping when starting but that is gone. Idle is very smooth as well.
What do you guys think?
So here's the numbers before and after:
75.2hp@ 5360rpm & 92.4ft-lbs@ 2721rpm
VS
79.5hp@ 5293rpm & 100.7ft-lbs@ 2824rpm
Throttle response is much more crisp. I also was getting popping when starting but that is gone. Idle is very smooth as well.
What do you guys think?
#26
06-03-2014 | 09:20 PM
#27
06-04-2014 | 04:25 AM
Ultimate HDF Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 7,439
Likes: 883
From: 'Noke, VA
Results are in......tuner said the canned map I had really wasn't that bad but it was to rich and was breaking up.
So here's the numbers before and after:
75.2hp@ 5360rpm & 92.4ft-lbs@ 2721rpm
VS
79.5hp@ 5293rpm & 100.7ft-lbs@ 2824rpm
Throttle response is much more crisp. I also was getting popping when starting but that is gone. Idle is very smooth as well.
What do you guys think?
So here's the numbers before and after:
75.2hp@ 5360rpm & 92.4ft-lbs@ 2721rpm
VS
79.5hp@ 5293rpm & 100.7ft-lbs@ 2824rpm
Throttle response is much more crisp. I also was getting popping when starting but that is gone. Idle is very smooth as well.
What do you guys think?
#28
06-04-2014 | 05:27 AM
Tourer
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
