Progressive Touring Link Review
#11
The following users liked this post:
rsking45 (02-05-2021)
#12
#13
Going to put in my .02 regarding wobble. I ride a '13 Ultra Limited. 255 cams, V&H X-pipe, Screamin' Eagle A/C, and CFR pipes. That setup actually has nothing to do with wobble, really, other than the bike gets up to speed in a hurry, and pushes through the twisties with extra torque.
I experienced wobble on my last bike, a Yamaha RoyalStar Tour Deluxe. Long, sweeping turns at 70mph+ sent the thing into a near-panic. On the Ultra, I experience the exact same thing, just at a much more subtle level. It's just the way steel frames flex. I've seen and heard a lot of great things about the Touring Link. The physics make sense to me. Two parts of the bike are responding to road conditions in their own way. Linking the engine to the frame allows the two parts to react in a more uniform fashion, thus reducing the frame flex.
I don't think H-D incorporates it into their design because it's not worth the extra expense to accommodate folks who like to push their bikes. I like to push my bike. It's part of the reason I own one, and for the most part, the Ultra does great. Since you have to pull the pipes to install, I'm waiting until the off-season to dig into that. I'm definitely going there, though.
Again, just my .02, since I haven't yet experienced it firsthand.
I experienced wobble on my last bike, a Yamaha RoyalStar Tour Deluxe. Long, sweeping turns at 70mph+ sent the thing into a near-panic. On the Ultra, I experience the exact same thing, just at a much more subtle level. It's just the way steel frames flex. I've seen and heard a lot of great things about the Touring Link. The physics make sense to me. Two parts of the bike are responding to road conditions in their own way. Linking the engine to the frame allows the two parts to react in a more uniform fashion, thus reducing the frame flex.
I don't think H-D incorporates it into their design because it's not worth the extra expense to accommodate folks who like to push their bikes. I like to push my bike. It's part of the reason I own one, and for the most part, the Ultra does great. Since you have to pull the pipes to install, I'm waiting until the off-season to dig into that. I'm definitely going there, though.
Again, just my .02, since I haven't yet experienced it firsthand.
#14
Going to put in my .02 regarding wobble. I ride a '13 Ultra Limited. 255 cams, V&H X-pipe, Screamin' Eagle A/C, and CFR pipes. That setup actually has nothing to do with wobble, really, other than the bike gets up to speed in a hurry, and pushes through the twisties with extra torque.
I experienced wobble on my last bike, a Yamaha RoyalStar Tour Deluxe. Long, sweeping turns at 70mph+ sent the thing into a near-panic. On the Ultra, I experience the exact same thing, just at a much more subtle level. It's just the way steel frames flex. I've seen and heard a lot of great things about the Touring Link. The physics make sense to me. Two parts of the bike are responding to road conditions in their own way. Linking the engine to the frame allows the two parts to react in a more uniform fashion, thus reducing the frame flex.
I don't think H-D incorporates it into their design because it's not worth the extra expense to accommodate folks who like to push their bikes. I like to push my bike. It's part of the reason I own one, and for the most part, the Ultra does great. Since you have to pull the pipes to install, I'm waiting until the off-season to dig into that. I'm definitely going there, though.
Again, just my .02, since I haven't yet experienced it firsthand.
I experienced wobble on my last bike, a Yamaha RoyalStar Tour Deluxe. Long, sweeping turns at 70mph+ sent the thing into a near-panic. On the Ultra, I experience the exact same thing, just at a much more subtle level. It's just the way steel frames flex. I've seen and heard a lot of great things about the Touring Link. The physics make sense to me. Two parts of the bike are responding to road conditions in their own way. Linking the engine to the frame allows the two parts to react in a more uniform fashion, thus reducing the frame flex.
I don't think H-D incorporates it into their design because it's not worth the extra expense to accommodate folks who like to push their bikes. I like to push my bike. It's part of the reason I own one, and for the most part, the Ultra does great. Since you have to pull the pipes to install, I'm waiting until the off-season to dig into that. I'm definitely going there, though.
Again, just my .02, since I haven't yet experienced it firsthand.
The following users liked this post:
JTM65 (05-28-2022)
#15
IMO there are issues with the touring link.. I've tried a copy of the Progressive link and it didn't help on my 07 egc.. It's my belief the frame is actually flexing where the 2 rubber mounts are compressed.. A touring link only attaches to 1 side of the frame allowing the other side to flex.. True tracks at least fasten then rear part of the drive trave train to a stiffer part of the frame..
Picture of a touring link style. (single sided)
Picture of True-Track.. Note picture closer to bagger-brace
Picture of a touring link style. (single sided)
Picture of True-Track.. Note picture closer to bagger-brace
Last edited by Max Headflow; 07-06-2014 at 05:54 PM. Reason: make image bigger
#16
I've hit both angles...
Bagger Brace and pro glide mounts. My bike (2000 FLHRI with 120R) is as solid as can be. I came from rice rockets before this bike and probably push it closer to the limits than I should but after those two upgrades, the bike is on rails. Whomever was talking about frame flex doesn't understand "bagger wobble". Following the alignment procedures that you can see on YouTube while installing the pro glide mounts probably made the largest difference. That guy knows what he is talking about!! The RK has never tracked so straight.
#17
American Iron Baggers Magazine had an article on installing a Tour Link in a 2013 bagger, I believe, in this month's issue. It indicated that it will not go on that particular year if it has a stock exhaust...hadn't heard that before about mine, it's a different part number, hopefully won't be an issue when the time comes.
Good review, thank you!
Good review, thank you!
#18
Bagger Brace and pro glide mounts. My bike (2000 FLHRI with 120R) is as solid as can be. I came from rice rockets before this bike and probably push it closer to the limits than I should but after those two upgrades, the bike is on rails. Whomever was talking about frame flex doesn't understand "bagger wobble". Following the alignment procedures that you can see on YouTube while installing the pro glide mounts probably made the largest difference. That guy knows what he is talking about!! The RK has never tracked so straight.
#19
I installed the Progressive Touring Link I guess 2 years ago on my 08 FLHR. Prior to this I had experienced the "wobble" once. I liked the PTL since it didn't interfere with my frame while using my J&S Jack when servicing my bike. Plus the cost was right for my budget. My bike now feels much tighter and tracks straighter. No noticeable extra vibrations since installing. I've been pleased with this modification.
#20
Please don't get me wrong and I'm trying not to be an idiot about this, but unfortunately your incorrect in the fact that the frame doesn't need one. I could take you on 3 roads here in So Cal where you can experience a high speed wobble consistently at 75+ MPH every time. Granted speed, Tire Pressure and Road Dynamics/Harmonics can all play a part in it, but I found that there are times its just the frame and nothing else.
UPDATE: I just ordered one, Elqueso, all is well in the world! We'll see if I notice a difference!
Last edited by Veekness; 07-08-2014 at 07:51 AM.