PV Map needed for Woods 222 cams
#1
PV Map needed for Woods 222 cams
Does anyone have a PV map they could share for Woods 222 cams in a 103 with an air cleaner and 2-1 Dragula pipe (or any other 2-1)?
Ive been trying a few base maps and retuning ,but im way lean to start from.
the Bike is a 2012 fltk
Thanks , Tramp
Ive been trying a few base maps and retuning ,but im way lean to start from.
the Bike is a 2012 fltk
Thanks , Tramp
Last edited by timber_tramp; 05-04-2014 at 11:03 PM.
#4
Here are a couple. The lean one is 3 to 4% leaner at idle and cruise area and will get the best mileage. Either one will likely work for you.
#5
I am currently running a map provided by ke5rbd on the build described in my signature and the bike runs great! I am going to get it dynoed, but I doubt there is much more to get out of it based on how strong it runs. He knows his stuff and I don't think you can go wrong with one of his maps.
#6
I am currently running a map provided by ke5rbd on the build described in my signature and the bike runs great! I am going to get it dynoed, but I doubt there is much more to get out of it based on how strong it runs. He knows his stuff and I don't think you can go wrong with one of his maps.
#7
Trending Topics
#8
#10
I wouldn't let it autotune below 1750 rpms area. Performance Cams have more reversion at low speed and can tend to cause misreadings from the O2's and will lean it out too much and cause drive ability issues. If you get unusual readings above or below 10 difference I would be very leery of these also. I find that you are better off to run the map for a while then once you are familiar with how the bike runs under various conditions, then you can tell how the autotune is working. This is assuming the the tune is working ok. My observations with Performance cams is auto tune can be a little misleading. Been there more than once.