2014 Air Cleaner vs alternative
#1
2014 Air Cleaner vs alternative
Has anyone heard about or seen dyno numbers from the stock 103 with a stock air cleaner vs. the same setup with nothing but the air cleaner changed to something such as the heavy breather? I am curious as to how much better flow the heavy breather would be vs the stock air cleaner on the 2014 FLHX I am going to be picking up next week. If I could save 300 dollars and get comparable flow out of the stock air cleaner, I would like to since I don't think the stocker looks all that bad.
#2
#4
HD usually only publishes torque numbers...however the screaming eagle catalog usually has dyno charts for stock vs stage1,2,3 etc "kits".
so that can give a baseline.
I do not have any 2014 model specific info, but the old stock air cleaner housing was good to flow about 140 CFM.
The S/E, Ness and most others flowed from about 225 and on up...which is more than the motor could ever require.
there is no magic to the heavy breather that the others don't have...it is more an appearance package.
I can think of 3 reason I don't want one on my bike:
cost- ( i am cheep and used the $115 Ness big sucker)
looks- it exposes the ugly plug and wiring on the throttle body
comfort- it pushes my rt knee out and I have hit the darn thing with my toe going for the brake ( test rode a bike with one)
In general, a "stage 1" has been good for 7 to 10 horsepower, and i am sure that the numbers will be similar for your stage 1
Mike
so that can give a baseline.
I do not have any 2014 model specific info, but the old stock air cleaner housing was good to flow about 140 CFM.
The S/E, Ness and most others flowed from about 225 and on up...which is more than the motor could ever require.
there is no magic to the heavy breather that the others don't have...it is more an appearance package.
I can think of 3 reason I don't want one on my bike:
cost- ( i am cheep and used the $115 Ness big sucker)
looks- it exposes the ugly plug and wiring on the throttle body
comfort- it pushes my rt knee out and I have hit the darn thing with my toe going for the brake ( test rode a bike with one)
In general, a "stage 1" has been good for 7 to 10 horsepower, and i am sure that the numbers will be similar for your stage 1
Mike
Last edited by mkguitar; 09-19-2013 at 04:53 PM.
#5
#6
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: North of Hell, South of Heaven
Posts: 5,737
Received 350 Likes
on
217 Posts
The new air cleaner on the 14' 103 high output falls in between last year's stock unit and a stage 1 in regard to air flow. The cam is a modified SE255 designed for more useable mid-range torque. The stage 1 heavy breather will be better, but the upgraded 103 is pretty sweet in stock mode.
#7
Trending Topics
#8
Does K&N have an element that works in the new air box?
#9
I had more power with my stock headers (09, no catt from the factory) until I ran auto tune basic about 3 times with my Power vision when I switched to true duals. If you pick the bike up with the mods installed, you won't have a comparison from stock and will blindly accept that it runs really good when it may just be louder than stock and nothing more.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post