2014 Harley FLHTK Twin Cooled testing & info by Fuel Moto
#231
First off let me say thanks for the work you guys are doing .I am buying a new limited next year (2015) and the info is great. I find it interesting that there are so many skeptics and non engineers making negative statement. I would suggest that folks look at the history of the T C motor and suggest that it has always been the plan for this motor to have some type of cooling .Donny Peterson noted early on when being one of the first builders to view the TC 88 (Pre Production) that the build and design was set up to allow this type of application. Harley has a number of engineers in different fields of expertise. Beyond the hole in the fairing ( which my guess was asked and answered by a bunch of engineers and lab as well as field tested for more hours than we could imagine) This bike and system was worked and reworked over 4 years with a lot of foresight given to the future I’m sure .My guess is that internally as far as the wiring and other sub systems on the bike there is a heck of a lot more going on than any of us realize . Take a breath and thank the MOCO for staying relevant but holding onto classic lines and desighns
The following users liked this post:
Hoyt15 FLHTK (08-22-2023)
#232
First off let me say thanks for the work you guys are doing .I am buying a new limited next year (2015) and the info is great. I find it interesting that there are so many skeptics and non engineers making negative statement. I would suggest that folks look at the history of the T C motor and suggest that it has always been the plan for this motor to have some type of cooling .Donny Peterson noted early on when being one of the first builders to view the TC 88 (Pre Production) that the build and design was set up to allow this type of application. Harley has a number of engineers in different fields of expertise. Beyond the hole in the fairing ( which my guess was asked and answered by a bunch of engineers and lab as well as field tested for more hours than we could imagine) This bike and system was worked and reworked over 4 years with a lot of foresight given to the future I’m sure .My guess is that internally as far as the wiring and other sub systems on the bike there is a heck of a lot more going on than any of us realize . Take a breath and thank the MOCO for staying relevant but holding onto classic lines and desighns
That dyno chart is sad IMHO. Now you have all that extra crap (lowers, radiators, water pump, hoses, coolant etc.) to cool one lousy quart of water and that dyno sheet is the result? No thanks. JMHO.
Rick
Last edited by Egldr05; 08-30-2013 at 11:34 AM.
#233
I've had many different makes of bikes and belonged to the owner group forums for most of them. It's funny how you can read through the posts and they sound like they are the only bikes that have problems and issues. For anyone that gets pissed at Harley and their engineering or model choices, just go visit a competitor forum for awhile and listen to all the bitching going on about their engineering or model choices.
#234
The 103 twin cooled dyno graph is pretty impressive, I think there's a lot left on the table for the 110, they probably left the compression the same, the same 50mm throttle body, the same 255 cams, just pumped some coolant thru the heads and added a new compensator. they should have massive gains with a little more compression and cams.
#235
I've had many different makes of bikes and belonged to the owner group forums for most of them. It's funny how you can read through the posts and they sound like they are the only bikes that have problems and issues. For anyone that gets pissed at Harley and their engineering or model choices, just go visit a competitor forum for awhile and listen to all the bitching going on about their engineering or model choices.
Rick
Last edited by Egldr05; 08-30-2013 at 11:50 AM.
#236
I've had many different makes of bikes and belonged to the owner group forums for most of them. It's funny how you can read through the posts and they sound like they are the only bikes that have problems and issues. For anyone that gets pissed at Harley and their engineering or model choices, just go visit a competitor forum for awhile and listen to all the bitching going on about their engineering or model choices.
#237
I just think with all of the known problems they could do better if they wanted to. Some of the fixes are not all that costly. Take the inner cam bearings for example. It's my understanding the new bikes finally have full complement bearings. How long did that take? Of course the trade off is removing the grease zerk from the neck.
Rick
Rick
And has not yet to be proven as a problem.... Seriously how many bikes out there do this service that have never had zerks? its just perception IMO
#238
I've had many different makes of bikes and belonged to the owner group forums for most of them. It's funny how you can read through the posts and they sound like they are the only bikes that have problems and issues. For anyone that gets pissed at Harley and their engineering or model choices, just go visit a competitor forum for awhile and listen to all the bitching going on about their engineering or model choices.
Beary
#239
Don't blame the engineers
The engineers hands are tied by the marketing and finance people.
I am sure that if you were able to ask the engineers what they wanted you would see many different things. As an engineer I can tell you that not many of my ideal designs go from paper to real world. You get told "Make it less expensive" or "Make it faster to implement". I doubt it was the engineers idea to use a caged bearing on the cams. They were told to engineer to a price.
I am sure that if you were able to ask the engineers what they wanted you would see many different things. As an engineer I can tell you that not many of my ideal designs go from paper to real world. You get told "Make it less expensive" or "Make it faster to implement". I doubt it was the engineers idea to use a caged bearing on the cams. They were told to engineer to a price.
#240
Sorry, but I'm not all that impressed with HD engineering. If they were half as good as you seem to think they are we wouldn't have half the problems seen on these forums on a regular basis. I'm also not all that taken in by the cosmetic improvements but that's a personal thing I guess.
That dyno chart is sad IMHO. Now you have all that extra crap (lowers, radiators, water pump, hoses, coolant etc.) to cool one lousy quart of water and that dyno sheet is the result? No thanks. JMHO.
Rick
That dyno chart is sad IMHO. Now you have all that extra crap (lowers, radiators, water pump, hoses, coolant etc.) to cool one lousy quart of water and that dyno sheet is the result? No thanks. JMHO.
Rick