I wasn't questioning your honor or integrity
Those numbers on stock heads has never been done
hence my bs statement
As you probably know, dyno operators can manipulate the numbers
regardless, Iam sure your bike runs great.........and in the end, that's all that maters
At any rate that's a nice power curve and I'm sure a great improvement over stock. I put very little stock in random dyno numbers because of all the variables of dynos and operators. Only means something if its before and after or with the same dyno and operator. Take the same bike to five different dynos/operators and ya will get a wide range of results.
Don't have the run in SAE...but my STD run was done at a 70 degree ambient air temp instead of the usual 60. Without taking that into consideration and given the standard SAE correction factor, that still equates to 101hp. Come on Spring!!
I have the same cams in my bike all stock 103 and pulled 96 hp and 111 tq but runs like **** down low at idol. It has a hell of a power band down low but those cams need compression and head work. Or they will stumble at low idol till warm. They also have a lot of valve train noise.
I wasn't questioning your honor or integrity
Those numbers on stock heads has never been done
hence my bs statement
As you probably know, dyno operators can manipulate the numbers
regardless, Iam sure your bike runs great.........and in the end, that's all that umaters
If you go on www.fuelmotousa.com and go to 107 kits you will see that for a long time now they have been showing dyno sheets where bikes with stock heads are producing numbers close to or above 120 ft/lb of torque. I'm not saying they are accurate, but there are dyno sheets and the customers are happy! Here is one of a 107 ci with TW-555 cams and stock heads. I'm really considering trying the TW-888's in my 107.