I just got these cams in an 09 road king 103. Different bike. Dyno 97 horse and 109 torque. Tremendous increase and I highly recommend them if anyone is shopping.

 

thanks for the info. I am considering them in place of my SE255 but kinda sitting on the fence as I am not sure the difference is worth the $$. ride safe

 

If you want to feel more get up and go, the TW 222 will spank the SE 255.

 

Does the TW22 produce its Tq way low in the RPM's like a 203 ?

 

Yes. Check Fuel Moto's website. A 103 equipped with their exhaust and 222's is already hitting 100 lb/ft at 2500 RPM.

 

Were you running the SE-255's before the TW-222's? Just curious if your going by dyno sheets or real world seat of the pants riding comparisons on your own bike....

 

The 222 is a great cam, so is the SE 204, they both are very close in specs, the 255 and 203 are called smog cams because they still pass EPA, the 255 comes stock in the CVO, if you want a real good increase the 222 and SE 204 are much better, I tried a lot of cams and for a bolt in cam they are 2 of the best in my opinion.

 

According to his YouTube video, he switched from 255's to 222's.

 

just installed the 222's and im at 90/100

 

Awesome, it shows on your sheet...