Service manual torque value....THIS CAN'T BE RIGHT
#41
Bottom line - the torque values specified for the majority of fasteners on your bike are simply not that critical. If they were, the torquing process would be defined in much more detail than a lone torque value range.
The cover screws referenced in the OP fit in this category.
The cover screws referenced in the OP fit in this category.
Just as background reference, I am a mechanical engineer. I have my BS in Mechanical Engineering from a very well respected engineering program. I, also, passed the Fundamentals of engineering exam. go ahead and look up the pass rates on this exam, it is always changing but hangs around 40-60%....
To be perfectly honest, when Engineers provide torque specs for something of this nature, we basically use a "back of the envelope" calculation, based on several assumptions, and approximations. Of course, engineers are taught to err on the side of caution and always use conservative estimates. This builds in an added factor of safety, on top of the Factor of Safety that we were shooting for.
#42
No, It certainly wouldn't be the first typo in a manual. but the difference in the values, doesn't amount to much of anything. use the lower of the 2 for safety's sake, and I bet there are no issues... if there proves to be an issue--LEAK... remove and re-tighten... not much of an issue in my opinion.
#46
#47
Of course, it could never be that there might be a Harley trained mechanic on here who could provide the factory reason as to why something changed. The Midol comments crack me up, and so needed. With everything else Harley won't stand behind, do you think a broken or stripped bolt would be fixed under warranty just because of a misprint in the manual? The original question seems perfectly reasonable to me. Is there a reason that someone with the EXPERIENCE and knowledge to recognize a change is given so much grief? Some of you kiddies should just go out and play, don't tease the fat kid either.
#48
#50