2012 rear brake issue
#1
2012 rear brake issue
hello all...
my '12 Ultra LTD w/650 miles and ABS has **** poor rear braking, it requires what I feel is extraordinary effort to accomplish a simple task... ie; stop the bike
has anyone changed the brake pads to another brand, and had any resolution?
dealer thinks the pads are glazed but it's been like this since new and 6 miles on the odo.. it is getting somewhat better but it's still lightyears from being acceptable.... master cylinder maybe??
I have owned 3 other bike brands with ABS before this one, and had zero issues, in fact they were ALL great..
thanx for any idea's
my '12 Ultra LTD w/650 miles and ABS has **** poor rear braking, it requires what I feel is extraordinary effort to accomplish a simple task... ie; stop the bike
has anyone changed the brake pads to another brand, and had any resolution?
dealer thinks the pads are glazed but it's been like this since new and 6 miles on the odo.. it is getting somewhat better but it's still lightyears from being acceptable.... master cylinder maybe??
I have owned 3 other bike brands with ABS before this one, and had zero issues, in fact they were ALL great..
thanx for any idea's
#3
My 2010 feels the same way when compared to "other" brands of bikes I have ridden in the last 39 years. With 5k miles I got tired of the noise and replaced the pads with aftermarket "sintered" kevlar impregnated pads. Noise went away, stopping is only marginally better. I was surprised at how little brake material there is, I would assume all of the pads are made with very hard material to last as long as possible and this would cause what you are describing. BTW, I'm a 25yr. master tech/automotive trainer so I am somewhat familiar with brakes and components.
#4
you should be able to get to the lock up point pretty easy with your right foot- if you are not getting there then there is a fault, whether glazing, contamination or air in the lines. Even a problem with the switch
can you make it lock ?
the front does all the braking.
the weight shifts , the rear locks up and skids on non-abs bikes.
I know that my 900 pound 09 stops in half the space of my evo bagger
and I know that the 480 pound evo fxr stopped pretty good too.
you have to consider weight/speed/traction/stopping distance
Mike
can you make it lock ?
the front does all the braking.
the weight shifts , the rear locks up and skids on non-abs bikes.
I know that my 900 pound 09 stops in half the space of my evo bagger
and I know that the 480 pound evo fxr stopped pretty good too.
you have to consider weight/speed/traction/stopping distance
Mike
Last edited by mkguitar; 10-17-2012 at 03:39 PM.
#5
my point is this, I am trying to understand why I have to put a LOT of extra pedal pressure to get it to respond to NORMAL braking when it's used...
my 07 SG and my previous 4 Harley's are/were smoooooth and responsive non-ABS braking, and doesn't require me to lift my foot off the board, and put my body weight into getting the bike to simply stop..
front brakes work great, but there are times when you NEED to use the rear brake
I've had 3 previous ABS equipped other make bikes that were awesome, so I know something is wrong with this one
and, I know i'm not the first person to bitch about this either..
thanx for the replies
#6
I have the same bike and would say that it brakes just fine in my opinion. I don't feel like I have to put much pressure on the rear pedal to get it to stop and definitely don't have to put my body weight behind it. It's also very comparable to my previous non-HD ride. Maybe you can find someone near you with the same bike that might swap with you in a parking lot or something to find out if it's you or the bike.
I wouldn't take a "that's the way it is on your bike" response from your dealer. Get it fixed...it's your brakes after all.
I wouldn't take a "that's the way it is on your bike" response from your dealer. Get it fixed...it's your brakes after all.
#7
I fully comprehend what ABS is, and how/why it works..
my point is this, I am trying to understand why I have to put a LOT of extra pedal pressure to get it to respond to NORMAL braking when it's used...
my 07 SG and my previous 4 Harley's are/were smoooooth and responsive non-ABS braking, and doesn't require me to lift my foot off the board, and put my body weight into getting the bike to simply stop..
front brakes work great, but there are times when you NEED to use the rear brake
I've had 3 previous ABS equipped other make bikes that were awesome, so I know something is wrong with this one
and, I know i'm not the first person to bitch about this either..
thanx for the replies
my point is this, I am trying to understand why I have to put a LOT of extra pedal pressure to get it to respond to NORMAL braking when it's used...
my 07 SG and my previous 4 Harley's are/were smoooooth and responsive non-ABS braking, and doesn't require me to lift my foot off the board, and put my body weight into getting the bike to simply stop..
front brakes work great, but there are times when you NEED to use the rear brake
I've had 3 previous ABS equipped other make bikes that were awesome, so I know something is wrong with this one
and, I know i'm not the first person to bitch about this either..
thanx for the replies
Trending Topics
#8
#9
Check the brake pedal piviot, could be binding up, also look at the rear calaper, making sure it floats on the pins with no binding. I felt like my rear brake/abs was usless when I got my 10 ultra and was ready to disconnect it but I've learned to use the front with more confidence because of the abs.
#10