Touring Models Road King, Road King Custom, Road King Classic, Road Glide, Street Glide, Electra Glide, Electra Glide Classic, and Electra Glide Ultra Classic bikes.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Heads question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 09-16-2012, 11:28 PM
fastbagger's Avatar
fastbagger
fastbagger is offline
Road Captain
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: AZ
Posts: 591
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
Default Heads question

'09 FLHX stock, SERT tuned, SE/AC, supertrapp slipons. Want some more power. Was thinking of few options as I want to use all HD parts. Today I priced some OEM heads for 12-13 models that have the ACR's built in $800 for set. I want to either install heads and 255 cams and leave as '96, or also include 103 cylinders. Would heads work with either '96 or '103? Or more cost effective to have oem heads machined for ACR's? My main concern is the compression if I install cams and bigger cylinders thanks.
 
  #2  
Old 09-17-2012, 12:09 AM
Desertwndrr's Avatar
Desertwndrr
Desertwndrr is offline
Tourer
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Southern Utah
Posts: 344
Received 27 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

Do not pay $800 for a set of heads. I have a set in my garage that are from a stock 103 with ACRs that I would gladly take $450 for. I bought a set of new castings that we're drilled for ACRs for $300 that I sent off to be worked over. There are plenty of take off head sets to be had for a decent price.

Your heads are almost exactly the same with the only real difference being the ACRs. If you have a 96" and wanted the 255 cams, personally I'd just change the cams and leave everything else alone. My opinion is that the 7cu increase to a 103 is not enough to warrant a ton of money and the 96" does not really need the compression releases if you religiously start the bike in neutral.

That said, if you are going to change the heads and cylinders and cams, at least go to a 107, add a GOOD cam for that displacement and compression, and have the heads worked over by a professional.

Just my humble opinion.
 
  #3  
Old 09-17-2012, 12:11 AM
Shredding rubber's Avatar
Shredding rubber
Shredding rubber is offline
Outstanding HDF Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Right about the middle
Posts: 3,450
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Going from 96 to 103 isn't worth the money. If your going to change the bore go either 106 with S&S or a fuel Moto 107.
I went 106. I've got 107hp/115tq to the rear wheel. Mine was a 96.
 
  #4  
Old 09-17-2012, 12:17 AM
PistonPuller's Avatar
PistonPuller
PistonPuller is offline
Ultimate HDF Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Eastern Washington
Posts: 5,190
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

I have a 103 on my 09. Its just bigger cylinders and pistons with stock heads. Don't think there is a difference in heads between 96 and 103.
 
  #5  
Old 09-17-2012, 09:04 AM
mgmmgm's Avatar
mgmmgm
mgmmgm is offline
Outstanding HDF Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Spokane, WA.
Posts: 2,711
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Depends on compression, and cams....

I think the 96" motor was 9.2:1 compression, the factory 103 ( power pack) in 2011 was 9.6:1 the ACR's are nice especially with the SE255 cam I had installed.

For future engine mods, compression releases not a bad way to go. I did not get them and wished that I had on my 103 build I had done on my 07 fatboy which had 9.8:1 compression, heads by Baisley with their roller rockers, and a redshift 575 cams. it had hot start issues that compression releases would have resolved.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Booxr
Engine Mechanical Topics
15
05-02-2016 09:00 PM
Shrink
Engine Mechanical Topics
7
04-28-2015 03:56 PM
Improved700
Touring Models
32
08-06-2014 07:01 AM
Garcou
Touring Models
4
01-05-2011 11:43 PM
MoChrome
Touring Models
6
08-30-2010 02:43 PM



Quick Reply: Heads question



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:16 AM.