Touring Models Road King, Road King Custom, Road King Classic, Road Glide, Street Glide, Electra Glide, Electra Glide Classic, and Electra Glide Ultra Classic bikes.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

2012 Touring MPH vs RPM

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #31  
Old 07-03-2012 | 10:38 PM
Keeper01's Avatar
Keeper01
Tourer
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 374
Likes: 1
From: Bakersfield
Default

Originally Posted by DannyZ71
While 5th gear will easily get you to 80 mph (even 4th will do that), I seriously doubt you are "lugging" the motor below that speed. So if you are cruising at 75 mph in 5th gear, you're probably getting pretty crappy gas mileage too.
Actually I get good gas mileage, but if I'm in 6th gear under 80 mph I can feel the motor bogging down and I generally don't cruise at 75. I'm more concerned with performance over mpg. I tend to ride a little on the aggressive side though. To each their own.
 
  #32  
Old 07-03-2012 | 10:40 PM
mgmmgm's Avatar
mgmmgm
Outstanding HDF Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,711
Likes: 6
From: Spokane, WA.
Default

okay-
my question is, if I have SE255 cams, can I go 6th gear on freeway at 65 mph, or should as i have been making it 70 mph and no less for 6th gear?
 
  #33  
Old 07-03-2012 | 10:56 PM
baust55's Avatar
baust55
Outstanding HDF Member
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,283
Likes: 4
From: nebraska
Default

My 2008 FLHRC owners manual says i can shift to 6th at 60mph . the tech at HD that did the runthrew with me when i picked it up said to not shift to 6th till i was at 70mph, no tach so thats what i do.
 
  #34  
Old 07-04-2012 | 01:14 AM
wurk_truk's Avatar
wurk_truk
Outstanding HDF Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 2,543
Likes: 19
From: Ashland Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by sawbones25
Apparently my bike is different than everyone elses. I routinely cruise in 6th gear around 60 mph at just over 2000 rpm and it does just fine. Sometimes I go even slower...
If I need to accelerate, I twist the throttle and it accelerates. If I need to accelerate faster I downshift.
No it is NOT different. What is different is you are one of the last hold outs from running the engine too slow for conditions. 65 in 6th is fine, to the OP, but 60? That is right about the edge of things to go awry. Sounds cool and all, but in reality, you need to ride more like 2500 than 2000 for a lot of reasons, but mainly because of the crank. Crank receives an unnecessary 'pounding', and there really is about a 1/10,000 chance it could be YOUR crank takes a poop. But... also, the trade in frequency plays into this, too.

I learned the hard way in 09, and bent my crank from .0035 to .008 and I could feel the difference in my hands going numb.

Food for thought is all my brother member.
 
  #35  
Old 07-04-2012 | 08:40 AM
rushbass's Avatar
rushbass
Ultimate HDF Member
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,301
Likes: 1
From: Biloxi, MS
Default

Originally Posted by jerryleon
owners manual sez shift to 6th at 55.....but what does Harley know !!! LOL
They are in the business of selling new bikes and motor repairs...
 
  #36  
Old 07-04-2012 | 10:58 AM
Wild Card's Avatar
Wild Card
Thread Starter
|
Road Warrior
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,443
Likes: 9
From: North Carolina
Default

Originally Posted by paulhog
I think Joe's original reply was good advice to you. I didn't see the need to critisize him. You don't have a tach, so he was suggesting monitoring the speed instead and staying out of 6th gear unless you were hitting 70 mph. You may find your bike is actually happier at 75 in 6th gear, though.

I know how you feel about all the recent lugging posts. My toughest challenge sometimes is trying to maintain 45 mph on some roads (Malibu Canyon in CA. is my daily commute). 3rd gear puts me around 3200 rpm which I feel is racing it a bit in that gear (but perfect in 5th and 6th gear), but 4th gear puts me around 2500 or 2600 which I feel is too low. I'm sure you'll get some real good advice here... good luck!
Didn't mean to criticize him, Just a comprehension problem between us. All I was looking for was a speed reference to rpm.

What I was hoping for is for someone to go out run down the road in 6th gear and go 60mph, 65mph and 70 mph and report the rpms at each speed. As well as in 5th gear. That way I and the rest of the crowd will know.
 
  #37  
Old 07-04-2012 | 10:59 AM
Wild Card's Avatar
Wild Card
Thread Starter
|
Road Warrior
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,443
Likes: 9
From: North Carolina
Default

Originally Posted by wurk_truk
No it is NOT different. What is different is you are one of the last hold outs from running the engine too slow for conditions. 65 in 6th is fine, to the OP, but 60? That is right about the edge of things to go awry. Sounds cool and all, but in reality, you need to ride more like 2500 than 2000 for a lot of reasons, but mainly because of the crank. Crank receives an unnecessary 'pounding', and there really is about a 1/10,000 chance it could be YOUR crank takes a poop. But... also, the trade in frequency plays into this, too.

I learned the hard way in 09, and bent my crank from .0035 to .008 and I could feel the difference in my hands going numb.

Food for thought is all my brother member.
10- Roger this is my concern. I have found anything under 65 is lugging, this is by feel
 
  #38  
Old 07-04-2012 | 11:41 AM
Gearhead3's Avatar
Gearhead3
Road Captain
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 739
Likes: 2
From: St. Louis
Default

What no one has mentioned is the state of tune of each individual bike. For those with stock engines, I can understand where it would feel as if it were not pulling well @ lower RPM's (2200 or so) because of the stock lean tune. Whereas those with a Stage 1 may feel comfortable in that lower range. Also, some have gone with different cams which alters the way the bike feels. I have the FM 107 w/555's and my bike starts 'smoothing out' around 2200 RPM's and pulls strongly form 2500 on up. What I'm saying is that there is no 'one answer that fits all' riding conditions.
As for the OP, here's a list of MPH vs. RPM's using the final drive ratio of 2.875 (which your bike has) a 1:1 6th gear ratio and a tire heigth of 25.8. This chart doesn't take into account speedometer inaccuracy or other than stock tire sizes. My tire info came from the Michelin website using what they refer to as an 'in use' tire dimension. (mounted and inflated) The info can be found here, on page 10. http://www.michelinmotorcycle.com/pubs/fitment2012.pdf

The formula used to get these numbers came from here: http://www.wallaceracing.com/gear-speed.php
They have numerous formulas for all types of calculations. Hope this has been of some assistance in answering your original question.

6th gear
6500 RPM 173.53 MPH
6000 RPM 160.18 MPH
5500 RPM 146.84 MPH
5000 RPM 133.49 MPH
4500 RPM 120.14 MPH
4000 RPM 106.79 MPH
3500 RPM 93.44 MPH
3000 RPM 80.09 MPH
2500 RPM 66.74 MPH
2000 RPM 53.39 MPH
1500 RPM 40.05 MPH
1000 RPM 26.70 MPH


5th gear
3500 RPM 79.19 MPH
3000 RPM 67.87 MPH
2500 RPM 56.56 MPH
2000 RPM 45.25 MPH
 

Last edited by Gearhead3; 07-04-2012 at 12:04 PM.
  #39  
Old 07-04-2012 | 12:00 PM
nvsteve's Avatar
nvsteve
Ultimate HDF Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,977
Likes: 78
From: Nevada
Default

Originally Posted by Wild Card
Didn't mean to criticize him, Just a comprehension problem between us. All I was looking for was a speed reference to rpm.

What I was hoping for is for someone to go out run down the road in 6th gear and go 60mph, 65mph and 70 mph and report the rpms at each speed. As well as in 5th gear. That way I and the rest of the crowd will know.
Check this out:
http://www.andrewsproducts.com/PDF_f...osMPG-pg28.pdf
 
  #40  
Old 07-04-2012 | 12:08 PM
nvsteve's Avatar
nvsteve
Ultimate HDF Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,977
Likes: 78
From: Nevada
Default

Originally Posted by wurk_truk
No it is NOT different. What is different is you are one of the last hold outs from running the engine too slow for conditions. 65 in 6th is fine, to the OP, but 60? That is right about the edge of things to go awry. Sounds cool and all, but in reality, you need to ride more like 2500 than 2000 for a lot of reasons, but mainly because of the crank. Crank receives an unnecessary 'pounding', and there really is about a 1/10,000 chance it could be YOUR crank takes a poop. But... also, the trade in frequency plays into this, too.

I learned the hard way in 09, and bent my crank from .0035 to .008 and I could feel the difference in my hands going numb.

Food for thought is all my brother member.
Exactly. I've had my 07 Ultra since August 2006. When everybody started complaining about the clanking gear boxes and sluggish performance dealers were saying we didn't know how to ride the bikes. They said "not" to follow the shift points in the manual, to keep the rpms up. Many of us knew that already. I wonder if they upped the recommended shift points that it might conflict with EPA standards somehow?
 


Quick Reply: 2012 Touring MPH vs RPM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:59 PM.