I got curious about what my RKC was doing as far as torque and hp.

Hope this link posts



I was happy to feel an improvement, as bike had the data log done and V tune at 1000 miles. Now this dyno fine tuned at 6000 miles.

Nice to acquire a useable and noticeable 2ft# trq at 2700 rpm slight hp increase in that same start area of rpm.

Runs cooler, pipes sound crisper. Glad I had it checked.

 

Not too shabby!

 

Looks nice, Torque curve has a dip at 2500 rpm, but it picks up and stays up later!

 

That's the weirdest chart I've ever seen, hp on one side and torque on the other with different numbers for the line.

Nice power though, just a weird style of chart.

 

Yeah, that is bizarre, the lines are supposed to cross at 5250, wtf? Just figured out why - HP and TQ scales are different. Bizarre indeed.

 

That's with SE255 cams? The 255's I had in my Fat Boy turned on WAY earlier than that. Seems really odd!

 

I dunno but that is what the dyno gave for a read out. ( i did pull the packing off of the baffles of the monster rounds- so that might have lowered the torque a touch? )

It did sound really nice listening to the exhaust while the runs were taking place. LOL

Do you have a dyno of your FLSTF?
Maybe B engine makes earlier torque?
I had a 07 FLSTF with redshift 575 cams- tune never dialed in with the thundermax I had, shoulda stayed with SERT on that.

 

I was looking at the graph wrong. The higher curve is for the hp listed on the left side and lower curve is the tq listed on the right.
I was looking at the hp curve as the tq because it was the higher number.

So upon further review and after reading the chart properly...it looks more like I thought it should!.



Still a goofy looking chart though!


Your numbers are very close to my FLSTF @ 86hp/96tq

 

Good numbers!!