Touring Models Road King, Road King Custom, Road King Classic, Road Glide, Street Glide, Electra Glide, Electra Glide Classic, and Electra Glide Ultra Classic bikes.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Which to do first: fork upgrade or shock upgrade?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 04-06-2012 | 10:24 AM
schwangster's Avatar
schwangster
Seasoned HDF Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,697
Likes: 11
From: Qualicum Beach, B.C. CAN
Default

Originally Posted by 103megawatt
Do the front first. The front is where the control is. The front is where 75-80% of your braking is at. The nose will dive less when braking while riding two up with better front suspension.
Been thinking about this for a couple days trying to decide the answer. I have done both ends of my WG. Ohlins #3-3 on back. Fab's modded Intimidators, and Racetech springs front.
If I had to give one up now.... hard to choose.
But the edge would go to keeping the front end modifications. The ride and handling improved that much.
Of course, my butt and my backseat passenger would complain. So I have to keep both.
 
  #12  
Old 04-06-2012 | 10:28 AM
ga4boats's Avatar
ga4boats
Thread Starter
|
Road Warrior
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 1
From: Atlanta, GA
Default

Originally Posted by Stang951
enlighten us please!
Well I am willing to spend the money to get Ohlins 2-2 shocks; as for the front, I would love to get the Traxxion AK-20 setup, but that is $1,200 plus - although several years ago, a group buy was arranged with them by a forum member here. Traxxion also has a damper rod adjustment mod for about $450 that I may consider. I am leaning towards doing the front first and then seeing how bad the air shocks feel. Both stock components are weak links, but I am thinking the forks are inferior to the air shocks.
 
  #13  
Old 04-06-2012 | 10:38 AM
OldPhat's Avatar
OldPhat
Elite HDF Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,617
Likes: 161
From: Sparks Nevada
Default

Rear Shocks first, because your butt is closer to the shocks and it is that kick in the
seat you feel in your back. In some cases the forks are just an oil change away from
a better ride.
 
  #14  
Old 04-06-2012 | 10:53 AM
rg_dave's Avatar
rg_dave
Outstanding HDF Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,246
Likes: 19
From: Cypress, TX
Default

I'd say it depends on how you ride. I did the front when I went to the 21". I lowered the front 1" with progressive drop in springs and added ricor intiminators. Obviously, lowering the front is not the greatest thing for ride but the performance of the front end is vastly improved over stock. I just added shocks and the bike rides and tracks much better. Next winter I will probably go back into the front and replace the progressive springs with a better quality spring. Long story short if you ride shorter distances with faster cornering and hard front braking I would do the front first. If you mainly tour and ride a little less aggressively I would do the back first. The optimal situation is to do both at the same time and several good setups have been mentioned here. Just always be aware that we rarely speak negatively of things that we have dumped a bunch of money into so do lots and lots of research and don't get in a hurry.
 
  #15  
Old 04-06-2012 | 11:54 AM
FLHTCU Owner's Avatar
FLHTCU Owner
Road Warrior
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,549
Likes: 8
From: North Texas
Default

Originally Posted by ga4boats
Eventually, I plan on doing both, but I may not want to spend the money right now to do both at the same time. Which will improve the ride the most? I am planning to get decent parts for each and may pay Traxxion a visit. Any thoughts? Thanks for your .02.
I'd do the rear if it was me. But, I'm an a$$ man anyways ....
 
  #16  
Old 04-06-2012 | 12:16 PM
grbrown's Avatar
grbrown
Club Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 45,429
Likes: 2,872
From: Bedford UK
Default

Especially if you ride 2-up a lot, with the favourite person in your life, do the rear before the forks. Our Ohlins have transformed life for my wife in particular, improved our comfort and added to the daily mileage we can do. The bike never bottoms out now.

While improved forks are next on my own menu of improvements for ride quality, they are actually the fourth significant and worthwhile thing I plan to my bike. First was a change of tyres to give a smoother ride, improve handling and grip (Avons), next was a True-Track stabilizer kit to improve stability and control.

Ohlins really are the bee's knees - you will wonder how it took so long to discover them!
 
  #17  
Old 04-07-2012 | 08:22 AM
ga4boats's Avatar
ga4boats
Thread Starter
|
Road Warrior
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 1
From: Atlanta, GA
Default

Thanks for all the replies - this has been very helpful.
 
  #18  
Old 04-07-2012 | 09:20 AM
RBWIDE's Avatar
RBWIDE
Road Master
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 762
Likes: 14
From: Bellevue, NE
Default

I see they have 3 sets that are for FLH models...which of the two are you guys using? I say two because there's NO way I'm spending well over a thousand bucks for a pair of rear shocks...
 
  #19  
Old 04-07-2012 | 09:28 AM
barkingspud's Avatar
barkingspud
Cruiser
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
From: Aurora, IL
Default

I did the HD Premium Suspension front and rear on mine over the winter. I really think it depends on how you ride. If you're two-up a lot, do the rear first then the front. Either way, it will be a big improvement.
 

Last edited by barkingspud; 04-07-2012 at 10:12 AM.
  #20  
Old 04-07-2012 | 09:50 AM
johnjay's Avatar
johnjay
Road Warrior
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,416
Likes: 1
From: North Jersey
Default

They both need to be done. I did the forks first and then the shocks only because the forks are more work and time. Don't skimp on either or you will end up doing them all over again.
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:33 AM.