Touring Models Road King, Road King Custom, Road King Classic, Road Glide, Street Glide, Electra Glide, Electra Glide Classic, and Electra Glide Ultra Classic bikes.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

bang for my buck

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 03-28-2012, 11:20 AM
xdanman's Avatar
xdanman
xdanman is offline
Tourer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Piedmont,SC
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default bang for my buck

What would be the most bang for my buck first? Cam change or big bore kit?
 
  #2  
Old 03-28-2012, 11:23 AM
KCFLHRC's Avatar
KCFLHRC
KCFLHRC is offline
Ultimate HDF Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Jayhawk Country
Posts: 8,039
Received 1,301 Likes on 781 Posts
Default

The cam change is fairly easy and inexpensive. The big bore kit is a lot more labor intensive and more expensive. Guess it depends on how much bang is in your buck
 
  #3  
Old 03-28-2012, 11:29 AM
Holzarbeiter's Avatar
Holzarbeiter
Holzarbeiter is offline
Tourer
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Cam change then big bore,
best bang= both at the same time
 
  #4  
Old 03-28-2012, 11:36 AM
Fire-Medic's Avatar
Fire-Medic
Fire-Medic is offline
Road Warrior
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 1,960
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

IMHO a stage II, exhaust, A/C, "proper" tune, and cams will be the most bang for the buck. After that, HP/TQ cost per dollar goes up significantly.

To each their own.....
 

Last edited by Fire-Medic; 03-28-2012 at 01:33 PM.
  #5  
Old 03-28-2012, 01:29 PM
mkguitar's Avatar
mkguitar
mkguitar is offline
Extreme HDF Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Phoenix '53, '88, '09 Big Twins
Posts: 14,744
Received 398 Likes on 340 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by xdanman
What would be the most bang for my buck first? Cam change or big bore kit?
where are you now--- what is the baseline ?

Year/model bike ?




Mike
 

Last edited by mkguitar; 03-28-2012 at 01:34 PM.
  #6  
Old 03-28-2012, 01:39 PM
2010 ultra man's Avatar
2010 ultra man
2010 ultra man is offline
Tourer
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default bang

Don't think you are going to take your stock bike and turn it into a 100 HP monster by adding a cam, replacing the carburetor and putting on straight pipes. Getting an 80 inch Big Twin engine to produce 100 horsepower at the rear wheel is difficult, time consuming and quite expensive. You are much better off bolting in a Crane Fireball 310, an Andrews EV-27 or a V-Thunder EVL-3010 in your street bike than trying to find a long duration cam because you have been told 'bigger' cams makes more horsepower. A well designed and tuned engine combination, using a mild bolt-in cam is quite capable of embarrassing most other Harley's between stoplights. 100 horsepower is not very useful if the engine does not make power until 6000 RPM. Harley-Davidson Big Twin engines were not designed to take that kind of abuse. An engine with 70 HP at 4800 RPM and 85 foot pounds of torque at 3200 RPM can be a real thrill compared to a stock EVO motors.Just an opinion.
 
  #7  
Old 03-28-2012, 01:41 PM
2010 ultra man's Avatar
2010 ultra man
2010 ultra man is offline
Tourer
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

This applies to big twin/e.f.i. also.
 
  #8  
Old 03-28-2012, 01:47 PM
lionsm13's Avatar
lionsm13
lionsm13 is offline
Seasoned HDF Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Western South Dakota
Posts: 55,909
Received 75,263 Likes on 22,615 Posts
Default

That sounds exactly like you copied and pasted off of "Nightrider" Stephen Mullen's site?
The OP is talking about TC's though, not EVO's.
 
  #9  
Old 03-28-2012, 01:48 PM
fabrik8r's Avatar
fabrik8r
fabrik8r is offline
Outstanding HDF Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: earth
Posts: 2,916
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2010 ultra man
Don't think you are going to take your stock bike and turn it into a 100 HP monster by adding a cam, replacing the carburetor and putting on straight pipes. Getting an 80 inch Big Twin engine to produce 100 horsepower at the rear wheel is difficult, time consuming and quite expensive. You are much better off bolting in a Crane Fireball 310, an Andrews EV-27 or a V-Thunder EVL-3010 in your street bike than trying to find a long duration cam because you have been told 'bigger' cams makes more horsepower. A well designed and tuned engine combination, using a mild bolt-in cam is quite capable of embarrassing most other Harley's between stoplights. 100 horsepower is not very useful if the engine does not make power until 6000 RPM. Harley-Davidson Big Twin engines were not designed to take that kind of abuse. An engine with 70 HP at 4800 RPM and 85 foot pounds of torque at 3200 RPM can be a real thrill compared to a stock EVO motors.Just an opinion.
If the OP is asking about that 2010 in his sig then its 96", not 80", and its not unheard of to breech the 100 mark in TQ and/or HP with a cam + stage I.
 
  #10  
Old 03-29-2012, 03:36 PM
xdanman's Avatar
xdanman
xdanman is offline
Tourer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Piedmont,SC
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default re

I have KN filter on screaming eagle backplate, CVO power core slip ons, no cat, and currently have DobeckTFI. I am thinking of adding Rev perf EMS and maybe S&S cam for right now. I want a bottom end cam, nothing ratical. My next move will be 106 big bore kit after that.
 


Quick Reply: bang for my buck



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:17 AM.