Touring Models Road King, Road King Custom, Road King Classic, Road Glide, Street Glide, Electra Glide, Electra Glide Classic, and Electra Glide Ultra Classic bikes.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Harley Road King

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 01-31-2012, 11:18 AM
davidsdad's Avatar
davidsdad
davidsdad is offline
Road Warrior
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Flatwoods Kentucky
Posts: 1,260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

No brainer....2010 any day!
 
  #12  
Old 01-31-2012, 11:19 AM
05RKCRider's Avatar
05RKCRider
05RKCRider is offline
Cruiser
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Randleman, NC
Posts: 149
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Where do you live & ride, mountains or flatlander? I ride all over on my 05 RK Classic with efi & have no problems but when going from sea level to 12,000 feet on my 95 WG (gone, damn it) the carb sometime acted up.
 
  #13  
Old 01-31-2012, 11:23 AM
mllgator's Avatar
mllgator
mllgator is offline
Tourer
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

No question the frame is an improvement, but it is WAY more than that. 96 ci, fuel injected, 6 speed, cruise, 6 gallon tank, on & on.
If this is your commuter, reliability and rideability clearly are at the top of your list.
My opinion - GO WITH THE 2010. No Question.
 
  #14  
Old 01-31-2012, 11:26 AM
sargek's Avatar
sargek
sargek is offline
Road Warrior
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 1,916
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I couldn't help but post this - newer does not always equal better: https://www.hdforums.com/forum/touri...ring-bike.html

For me, the 96 and 6 speed are reasons to go back - not impressed and after I ride this one to the end of her useful life, I will not buy a newer one, but that's my choice.
 

Last edited by sargek; 01-31-2012 at 11:29 AM.
  #15  
Old 01-31-2012, 11:52 AM
jlfabian's Avatar
jlfabian
jlfabian is offline
Tourer
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Huntsville, Alabama
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My opinion is to go with the newer bike. Nothing wrong with older bikes. Newer bikes have less miles on them in general. Imma be the one to put the miles on the thing!

Plus, the 2010 should still be in warranty. Always a plus at the beginning.

I'm very pleased with my '09, but I came over from a liter class sportbike. I love my ride and would not consider anything short of a Road King (course I'm old).
 
  #16  
Old 01-31-2012, 10:17 PM
BlackCustomz's Avatar
BlackCustomz
BlackCustomz is offline
Advanced
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Indonesia
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I rode my buddy's 2009 Road King standard and found that the bike is tighter while turning compared to my 2004 Road King Custom. If I have the money, I will buy the 2010 model. Newer frame, bigger engine, bigger gas tank, and so on....
 
  #17  
Old 01-31-2012, 10:40 PM
Joker65's Avatar
Joker65
Joker65 is offline
Road Captain
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 742
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mllgator
No question the frame is an improvement, but it is WAY more than that. 96 ci, fuel injected, 6 speed, cruise, 6 gallon tank, on & on.
If this is your commuter, reliability and rideability clearly are at the top of your list.
My opinion - GO WITH THE 2010. No Question.

EASY decision...
 
  #18  
Old 02-01-2012, 02:16 AM
dickey's Avatar
dickey
dickey is offline
Seasoned HDF Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,818
Received 5,670 Likes on 2,540 Posts
Default

OK here's the deal:

1. The '97 will have the best resale value, in terms of being able to sell it for close to what you paid. I'm assuming you can get it around the 6-7 grand mark (what they're going for around here) and 5 years from now, assuming you maintain it, should not be worth much less. It will also be a PITA to source parts, and many accessories sold today won't fit it. Prolly have the best motor in terms of longevity.

2. The '010 has the new frame,IMHO not worth the hubbub unless you're a canyon carver at speed. Normal riding,you won't notice the difference. It also has the TBW, which I would ABSOLUTELY NOT own--way too unpredictable, and the lag is annoying as hell. Hard to clutch away from a stop as throttle input "feel" is gone, and easy to stall out. I want my hand connected to my EFI with a cable, not a digital signal. Not to mention the heat issue. '010 is the best looking & smoothest riding (because of the TBW & IDS) out of the 3, IMHO, but will have the worst resale in terms of the "hit" you will take compared to what you pay for it.

3. I would go for the '03. Prolly get it for around 9grand,I guess, keep it for a few years & take a 1 or 2 grand hit. Plus it will be easy to get parts, has throttle cables, and the 100th paint looks great.! ESPECIALLY if it's gunmetal.
 

Last edited by dickey; 02-01-2012 at 02:19 AM.
  #19  
Old 02-01-2012, 06:26 AM
Captain Bligh's Avatar
Captain Bligh
Captain Bligh is offline
Road Captain
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 540
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

I ride an '05. I have ridden later models with the new frame. By all means, buy something with the new frame. It is a great improvement.
 
  #20  
Old 02-01-2012, 06:47 AM
klaybus's Avatar
klaybus
klaybus is offline
Stellar HDF Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Southern Nevada (Pahrump)
Posts: 2,404
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

I've owned a 2011 and a 08 and I can tell you the frame isn't that big of an improvement. Don't do it just for the frame!
 


Quick Reply: Harley Road King



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:10 AM.