if the dyno is close to accurate you have the strongest box stock 103 I have seen to date by a bunch. 77hp and 100tq with just exhuast is by far. is it a dyno jet 250I that it was dynoed on?
if the dyno is close to accurate you have the strongest box stock 103 I have seen to date by a bunch. 77hp and 100tq with just exhaust is by far. is it a dyno jet 250I that it was dynoed on?
will try to find out what they are using cant wait to hear the thing with the exhaust tomorrow
if the dyno is close to accurate you have the strongest box stock 103 I have seen to date by a bunch. 77hp and 100tq with just exhuast is by far. is it a dyno jet 250I that it was dynoed on?
As long as all his comparisons are on the same dyno and run in the same correction factor, the results will stand. I agree these are high numbers for what he has. 100 TRQ on a stage I 103" without a tuner is unheard of.
As long as all his comparisons are on the same dyno and run in the same correction factor, the results will stand. I agree these are high numbers for what he has. 100 TRQ on a stage I 103" without a tuner is unheard of.
Hell it was 75/93 out of the box! Thats stout! I bet the correction factor is STD. That shows about 4% higher I believe. That would still make it impressive! If his sheet is in SAE he better hang onto that bike cause its "special". I owned an 88mdl chevy pickup that was "special".
Last edited by coolerman69; 01-13-2012 at 08:38 AM.