Touring Models Road King, Road King Custom, Road King Classic, Road Glide, Street Glide, Electra Glide, Electra Glide Classic, and Electra Glide Ultra Classic bikes.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Chain drive vs. Belt drive

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #21  
Old 05-16-2015, 07:46 AM
grbrown's Avatar
grbrown
grbrown is offline
Club Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bedford UK
Posts: 45,429
Received 2,866 Likes on 2,429 Posts
Default

I haven't owned a bike with an exposed rear chain since the 1970s, they are just so last century! As mentioned chains and sprockets don't last as long as a belt and the replacement argument will be easily lost by a high mileage chain bike. What I find frustrating is that modern manufacturing techniques make an enclosed rear chain very easy to do, which would significantly extend chain life, reduce noise and mess.
 
  #22  
Old 05-16-2015, 07:55 AM
Buelligan666's Avatar
Buelligan666
Buelligan666 is offline
Stellar HDF Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Eastern Ohio
Posts: 2,991
Received 922 Likes on 470 Posts
Default

What the hell does this have to do with touring bikes? Harley touring bikes haven't had chains in close to 35 yrs!
 
  #23  
Old 05-16-2015, 08:56 AM
hardheaded's Avatar
hardheaded
hardheaded is offline
Seasoned HDF Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: St.Louis Mo.
Posts: 10,750
Received 2,624 Likes on 1,622 Posts
Default

when you look back and see that belt laying on the ground , you'll wish you had a chain.
 
The following users liked this post:
Ballistic_21 (08-20-2020)
  #24  
Old 05-16-2015, 08:59 AM
lp's Avatar
lp
lp is online now
Seasoned HDF Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 11,358
Received 2,834 Likes on 1,595 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Buelligan666
What the hell does this have to do with touring bikes? Harley touring bikes haven't had chains in close to 35 yrs!
Yet 20 people are talking about it. Problem? Nope...
 
  #25  
Old 05-16-2015, 09:08 AM
grbrown's Avatar
grbrown
grbrown is offline
Club Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bedford UK
Posts: 45,429
Received 2,866 Likes on 2,429 Posts
Exclamation

Originally Posted by hardheaded
when you look back and see that belt laying on the ground , you'll wish you had a chain.
So you've never heard of or seen broken chains?! They can both break, the difference between the two being that a chain is much more effective at causing expensive collateral damage........
 
  #26  
Old 05-16-2015, 11:28 AM
68 Shovelking's Avatar
68 Shovelking
68 Shovelking is offline
Tourer
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Seattle
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by grbrown
So you've never heard of or seen broken chains?! They can both break, the difference between the two being that a chain is much more effective at causing expensive collateral damage........
Agreed, but the probability of a quality chain breaking is very slim. All it takes for the belt to fail is a tiny pebble to get trapped between the belt and pulley. My buddy had this happen on a trip a few years back, belt only had 25K. A friend who runs an Indy shop tells me he does a few failed belts a year. His personal bikes have all been converted to chain.
Belts are going to be smoother with a longer life span, but modern O or X ring chains don't stretch as unevenly or as much as standard chain. They also don't require any external lube except something for rust prevention. Modern chain-waxes are a great option to the messy lubes we used to use. I've been using O/X-ring chains on my dirt bikes and Shovelheads for over 20 years with zero issues, but I have no plans to replace the belt on my Road King.
 
  #27  
Old 05-16-2015, 11:48 AM
grbrown's Avatar
grbrown
grbrown is offline
Club Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bedford UK
Posts: 45,429
Received 2,866 Likes on 2,429 Posts
Cool

I've been riding belt drive Harleys for 25 years without incident - jus' sayin'!
 
  #28  
Old 05-16-2015, 12:58 PM
jamesroadking's Avatar
jamesroadking
jamesroadking is offline
Road Warrior
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Lake City, Florida
Posts: 1,328
Received 153 Likes on 95 Posts
Default

Agreed, belts are smoother, less maintenence, last longer, but why the hell does Harley Davidson designers have their heads up their asses and make it such at major / expensive job to replace the drive belts. If you look at the Victory's and I think the Yamaha's the drive belts are outside the clutch nubs, it looks like it would be about a fifteen minute job to change a belt on a Victory or a Yamaha.
 

Last edited by jamesroadking; 05-16-2015 at 01:00 PM.
  #29  
Old 05-16-2015, 01:18 PM
perki48's Avatar
perki48
perki48 is offline
Seasoned HDF Member
Veteran: Navy
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sandpoint, Idaho
Posts: 10,025
Received 4,406 Likes on 2,029 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tj84fxrt
But the old old Harleys back in early 1900's had a belt from crank shaft to rear wheel
And you "resurrected" a thread that is almost that old!
 
  #30  
Old 05-16-2015, 08:44 PM
hardheaded's Avatar
hardheaded
hardheaded is offline
Seasoned HDF Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: St.Louis Mo.
Posts: 10,750
Received 2,624 Likes on 1,622 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by grbrown
So you've never heard of or seen broken chains?! They can both break, the difference between the two being that a chain is much more effective at causing expensive collateral damage........
agree with you , besides dirt bikes, in all my years of riding i seen one guy break a chain doing wheelies on a chopper. i have seen at least ten belts broken over the years. and you are right about damage with a chain as this happen to a friend of mine. it cost him a trans case. i wouldn't bat an eye at running a chain now days as they are much better than years ago.
 

Last edited by hardheaded; 05-16-2015 at 08:48 PM.


Quick Reply: Chain drive vs. Belt drive



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:46 PM.