Chain drive vs. Belt drive
#11
#13
A modern chains with o-rings is much improved compared to an older chain. Also, there are chain lubes which have very little fling. Is a chain as clean to run as a belt? Answer is no, but it's really not that big of a deal.
#14
#15
I'm a new HD owner, maybe some day I'll know why some say it's harder to replace a belt than a chain. I'm not saying it's not, just can't imagine why unless by intentional design(or HD design).
I've never had issue with chains. I do have an issue with the supposedly "good" points on a shaft drive. After the prev.-main. and the paranoia on my Valk, I wished it had a chain, plus no worries of launching it and snaping an out of production u-joint(over a year).
A belt seems the way to me, I thought it sounded good way back on day one. I was paying attention even though I was metric.
I've never had issue with chains. I do have an issue with the supposedly "good" points on a shaft drive. After the prev.-main. and the paranoia on my Valk, I wished it had a chain, plus no worries of launching it and snaping an out of production u-joint(over a year).
A belt seems the way to me, I thought it sounded good way back on day one. I was paying attention even though I was metric.
#16
I'm a new HD owner, maybe some day I'll know why some say it's harder to replace a belt than a chain. I'm not saying it's not, just can't imagine why unless by intentional design(or HD design).
I've never had issue with chains. I do have an issue with the supposedly "good" points on a shaft drive. After the prev.-main. and the paranoia on my Valk, I wished it had a chain, plus no worries of launching it and snaping an out of production u-joint(over a year).
A belt seems the way to me, I thought it sounded good way back on day one. I was paying attention even though I was metric.
I've never had issue with chains. I do have an issue with the supposedly "good" points on a shaft drive. After the prev.-main. and the paranoia on my Valk, I wished it had a chain, plus no worries of launching it and snaping an out of production u-joint(over a year).
A belt seems the way to me, I thought it sounded good way back on day one. I was paying attention even though I was metric.
There is no master link on a belt. How are you going to install it without "exposing" the pulleys to drop the belt over them?
So you remove the primary with clutch and the rear wheel and swingarm.
It's about a 5 hour job. ( Wouldn't give up my belt for anything though. 98,000 miles and counting on the original on my bike.)
#17
Chains & Belts
If you're runnin with a chain, always carry a master link.
Chains themselves are not your only maintenance issue. Sprockets wear out too. Of course your hearing this from someone who used to take up slack in primary chain via slidding the tranny back, then take up slack in the drive chain, and then adjust the rear brake! Rode hard and replaced plenty of each.
I was concerned about my belt because of where I'm ridding (VN), but stateside this summer I saw a couple belts & pulleys with 100,000 + miles on them and they still looked good. Also saw another pulley off a big inch scoot with the sprocket worn to sharp teeth.
I like my belts.
Chains themselves are not your only maintenance issue. Sprockets wear out too. Of course your hearing this from someone who used to take up slack in primary chain via slidding the tranny back, then take up slack in the drive chain, and then adjust the rear brake! Rode hard and replaced plenty of each.
I was concerned about my belt because of where I'm ridding (VN), but stateside this summer I saw a couple belts & pulleys with 100,000 + miles on them and they still looked good. Also saw another pulley off a big inch scoot with the sprocket worn to sharp teeth.
I like my belts.
#18
#19
Harley came out in 1980 with belt on the fx Sturgis model an in 85 on the fxr an fl models, other than that the 80-84 fl an 82-84 fxr were enclosed chain final drive
#20