No problem, here's their link..
http://www.feulingparts.com/dynocharts.php

 

What is yr CCP?

 

Using the big boys heads calculator, 190+/-

 

No not calculated need to know what the actual measured is...before you do anything.

 

For what its worth the 7H is a good cam if you like to wind it out. Given your riding preference for the torque to come on earlier, the Tw6-6 and the TW-555 are designed specifically for low end torque and don't have much fall off till about 5 grand. Have a set of 6-6 in mine and I torch CVO's on a regular basis with a 96er. Just put a set of 555's in a 103 and it pulls like a train from about 2250 up. Buddy got on it and slapped it in the *** and it snatched the bars out of his hands. Big fan of Woods cams (if you couldn't tell). Their machining is top notch. Both should do well with your bumped compression. Andrews makes good stuff as well.

 

Like I said earlier, 54 is what you want.

 

i would call bob wood and see what he suggests but if you want to stay with woods cams and want to move the curve to the left then you want tw5-6's.

 

This is why I am telling you to use the Andrews 54 cams. Because you want some more bottom end. How is about 100 lb/ft at around 2000 rpm sound?

 

I appreciate the responses. That Andrews 54 chart sure looks good. I think I will call Bob Woods and get his input. I've chatted with Doc in FL about a tune and will try to head that way after Xmas. I rode 100 miles yesterday and it runs so nice, I may just be pissing in the wind. I want to be sure that anything I do actually makes it better. Sometimes, when you're trying to fix one thing, you create 2 more problems.

Don

 

Not to upset you but a correction factor of 1.24???? Not sure that is possible. I know where Prescott is but I'm not sure should there be a 25% bump for that elevation. What am I missing?