Engine Operating Temperature
#21
My bike never actuates the EITMS (approx 290 deg cyl head temp) with the parade fan running even on 100+ deg days regardless of how long I let it idle. And yes, the EITMS is enabled.
#22
With all due respect to everyone (and I mean that sincerely, not sarcastically), entirely too much time is wasted worrying about engine and oil temperature. With one or two exceptions on this forum, I ride more miles a year in more traffic than everyone else. I don't own (and will never own) an oil temperature gauge. I change the (synthetic) oil every 5,000 miles, regardless of how hot or cold out it is. In 40,000 miles of used oil analysis (done by Blackstone Labs), there has been utterly no indication of any issues with the oil or the engine.
#23
#24
Its all in what a person wants to achieve with their own ride, aint that what its all about, customizing these bike to our own preference. While true these air cooled powerplants can take about any heat a rider can tolerate, without experiencing catostrophic failure. No it isn't necessary but there is no denying there are lubrication, mechanical, performance, and rider comfort benefits to cooling. Niether side of the debate is wrong, just a different thought process and different goals. Just because someone has an oil cooler, parade, fan or a temp gauge, does not make them thermal hypochondriacs, paranoid, or hysterical, and just because someone doesn't have these things doesn't mean their mill will expire prematurely. I'll be the first to admit that in the past I've been pretty agressive at defending the pro-cooling side. I have significant knowledge and experience in this area, and I just can't sit by and say nothing while myths, half truths, and flat out lies are being posted about cooling. I do find it peculiar that folks who insist on building and tuning perfection to squeeze every ounce of TQ/HP, and then blatantly ignore the performance benefit of lowering operating temperature. Oh well, there's always PM, I'm pro-cooling and willing to have a productive discussion on the topic with anyone. Cool, don't cool, either way you aren't wrong, Peace.
#25
#26
Its all in what a person wants to achieve with their own ride, aint that what its all about, customizing these bike to our own preference. While true these air cooled powerplants can take about any heat a rider can tolerate, without experiencing catostrophic failure. No it isn't necessary but there is no denying there are lubrication, mechanical, performance, and rider comfort benefits to cooling. Niether side of the debate is wrong, just a different thought process and different goals. Just because someone has an oil cooler, parade, fan or a temp gauge, does not make them thermal hypochondriacs, paranoid, or hysterical, and just because someone doesn't have these things doesn't mean their mill will expire prematurely. I'll be the first to admit that in the past I've been pretty agressive at defending the pro-cooling side. I have significant knowledge and experience in this area, and I just can't sit by and say nothing while myths, half truths, and flat out lies are being posted about cooling. I do find it peculiar that folks who insist on building and tuning perfection to squeeze every ounce of TQ/HP, and then blatantly ignore the performance benefit of lowering operating temperature. Oh well, there's always PM, I'm pro-cooling and willing to have a productive discussion on the topic with anyone. Cool, don't cool, either way you aren't wrong, Peace.
Fact of the matter is that there are hundreds of thousands of stock bikes out there that aren't melting down. No one needs an oil cooler with a stock motor. With a good Stage One, you've corrected the VE tables, and there's no need for any additional cooling.
You start getting into high compression and sweating performance (which is flat-out silly on a Harley, but I'm as guilty as the next guy), then there's some logic in an oil cooler, but otherwise it's not a big deal.
Especially not for the typical 2,000 mile a year Harley rider. My Stage One FLHTK has sat in DC rush hour traffic at 105 degrees for 2 hours and nothing bad has happened.
#28
#30
While a cooler intake charge will generally make more power, there's just not much performance benefit from adding a parade fan. If you're talking about maximum performance, that's at speed, when the engine's being cooled by airflow. A fan does nothing for you then. I don't think an oil cooler's a bad idea. My Limited came with one, I added a Jagg 10-row to my high-compression Night Train.
Fact of the matter is that there are hundreds of thousands of stock bikes out there that aren't melting down. No one needs an oil cooler with a stock motor. With a good Stage One, you've corrected the VE tables, and there's no need for any additional cooling.
You start getting into high compression and sweating performance (which is flat-out silly on a Harley, but I'm as guilty as the next guy), then there's some logic in an oil cooler, but otherwise it's not a big deal.
Especially not for the typical 2,000 mile a year Harley rider. My Stage One FLHTK has sat in DC rush hour traffic at 105 degrees for 2 hours and nothing bad has happened.
Fact of the matter is that there are hundreds of thousands of stock bikes out there that aren't melting down. No one needs an oil cooler with a stock motor. With a good Stage One, you've corrected the VE tables, and there's no need for any additional cooling.
You start getting into high compression and sweating performance (which is flat-out silly on a Harley, but I'm as guilty as the next guy), then there's some logic in an oil cooler, but otherwise it's not a big deal.
Especially not for the typical 2,000 mile a year Harley rider. My Stage One FLHTK has sat in DC rush hour traffic at 105 degrees for 2 hours and nothing bad has happened.