Stopped for a helmet check......
#161
Go back and take a look at the first thing I wrote and take a dose of ur own medicine before prescribing it to someone else.
#162
I did, go look back and see when I edited my post. I already took out the parenthesis but not before you had already copied it. Apparently at the same time you posted this.
The point of the matter was that helmets, like safety belts when used in the proper manner can, but not always, reduce injuries.
Last edited by Harleybike; 10-10-2011 at 07:47 PM.
#164
I did, go look back and see when I edited my post. I already took out the parenthesis but not before you had already copied it. Apparently as the same time you posted this.
The point of the matter was that helmets, like safety belts when used in the proper manner can, but not always, reduce injuries.
The point of the matter was that helmets, like safety belts when used in the proper manner can, but not always, reduce injuries.
#166
That's why I have a life insurance policy. I see what you're saying, but it isn't government's place to tell us to wear a helmet. Why stop there, why not force everyone to stop all potentially self-destructive behavior? No smoking, junk food, drinking, tanning beds, slippery bathtubs, etc, etc.
Having said that, I live in a non-helmet state and usually wear one. My head - my choice.
Having said that, I live in a non-helmet state and usually wear one. My head - my choice.
That is EXACTLY what the **** party (National Socialist Party) did in Germany.
#167
I did, go look back and see when I edited my post. I already took out the parenthesis but not before you had already copied it. Apparently at the same time you posted this.
The point of the matter was that helmets, like safety belts when used in the proper manner can, but not always, reduce injuries.
The point of the matter was that helmets, like safety belts when used in the proper manner can, but not always, reduce injuries.
I do think it was bs for the officer to stop for the sole purpose of seeing if it were dot or not and im not so sure they are allowed to use that as pc for a stop or not
#168
Apparently, so far, some think that they do, and in those states, have convinced law makers that it is in the best interest of us(Joe citizen) that they decide what is best for us cuz we apparently can't think for ourselves.
#170
Thanks "wheel752!" had to look up the law!
Interesting!
Lot's of double speak written into it!
Wonder what would have happened had I protested the check?
I'll add again the officer was friendly and professional the whole time and never looked or checked anything else!
Here goes...
Interesting!
Lot's of double speak written into it!
Wonder what would have happened had I protested the check?
I'll add again the officer was friendly and professional the whole time and never looked or checked anything else!
Here goes...
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
This is why We The People must demand that our goverment follow the Constitution of the United States!