Ape Hanger Width??
#12
#13
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: In your head rent free
Posts: 5,533
Received 5,262 Likes
on
1,578 Posts
I have Carlini 16" standard apes on my RK.
Wide is better for long hauls. It feels a little weird to start , but you'll feel the differance when the miles roll.
I have 19" narrow apes on my 01 Wide Glide and while it's a great around town ride, it wouldn't suit me for long rides.
The whole point of apes is to stand up, spread out, open up.
Wide is better for long hauls. It feels a little weird to start , but you'll feel the differance when the miles roll.
I have 19" narrow apes on my 01 Wide Glide and while it's a great around town ride, it wouldn't suit me for long rides.
The whole point of apes is to stand up, spread out, open up.
#16
I am specifically buying a set from LA Choppers just because they are 40 inches wide. MY reasoning is because I am 285 lbs and my shoulders are as wide as your average NFL Linebacker and need them that far apart. If I was a little guy, yeah that would probably be excessive
Just bustin' you chops bro! Thanks for your service too.
I wish Carlini had 1.5" thickness in 12" height...
#17
#18
Ok, yea i just saw that on their website. For the 1.25" the width is 36.5" compared to the 1.5" being 41". I'm confused as to what would be the reason for this, and which would be more comfortable. I guess 2.25 inches per side isn't drastic sounding, but when it comes to ergonomics, inches definitely make a difference.. Thoughts? Wondering if I should exchange them for the 1.25".
#19
Interesting.. So the width isn't determined based on an ergonomic design, but rather based on the equipment and diameter of bar? Seems like there isn't much ergonomic design thought put into it, rather, "If you want 1.5" bars, your width has to be X."
#20