Blame the EPA...HD didn't want to put CAT & emissions on their bikes. Sorry to say - it's going to take ~$1K-2K to get your scoot running happy, but the answer is yes - spend the $$$. It's a good investment in the bike & will at least get you off the forum & out riding more..
The problem is Harley f'd up the stock calibration for high altitudes, in Denver I'm guessing you can't get 93 octane and they didn't do the greatest job accounting for it. It's not the EPA or the catalyst's fault, blame the calibrators at Harley.
Sounds like to me that the MOCO has reached their design limits for an air cooled motor, given the EPA spec. guidelines ! I don't understand how they can legally sell these bikes with all the pinging they do, and the customer has to spend more $ to make them run ? Could there be a class action here ? I think we will be seeing a water cooled soon !
JMHO Craig
Some are hot, some are not. I had an '08 Ultra and it would cook my leg in traffic on hot days. Had to add fuel management and change pipes to cool it down. Now I have an '11 Ultra, 100% stock, still has the break in oil in it. Rode 250 miles yesterday in 90 degree heat, with a passenger, up and down mountain summits and plenty of stop and go traffic too. No pinging, no real excess heat, slight throttle response delay in 6th gear. Why some run so damn hot and some don't is beyond me.
Realy, sounds like a few A holes here. The OP has a simple problem of a lean condition or low octane fuel and ya'll are opening up a law suit with MoCo.
Simple fix have MoCo re map it, or buy a tuner and do it yourself.