Harley Davidson Forums

Touring Models Road King, Road King Custom, Road King Classic, Road Glide, Street Glide, Electra Glide, Electra Glide Classic, and Electra Glide Ultra Classic bikes.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Dyno Results 07 SG 103 Stage 2 SE255

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 03-26-2011, 03:19 PM
denalion22's Avatar
denalion22
denalion22 is offline
Road Master
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 767
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default
Originally Posted by ThePointman
Congrats on your upgrade. Torque is more important anyway. I have a new 103 with the 255 cams and I am very happy as well.
Thanks. I love it. Thanks
 
Reply Like
  #12  
Old 03-26-2011, 03:39 PM
iclick's Avatar
iclick
iclick is offline
Extreme HDF Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 11,615
Likes: 0
Received 48 Likes on 32 Posts
Default
Let's also keep in mind the engine only had 500 miles on it when dyno-tuned. Give it some time to loosen-up and I think you'll see the numbers increase. I just love looking at flat TQ curves.
 
Reply Like
  #13  
Old 03-26-2011, 04:57 PM
Blue Duck's Avatar
Blue Duck
Blue Duck is offline
Road Master
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Douglasville, Ga
Posts: 796
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Just got in from picking up my
Ultra Limited. I already had the FuelMoto stage1. Had TW555's installed and dynoed at 91.40 HP and 105.58 TQ. I was trying to beat a major storm so I only got to ride it from dealer to home (16 mi), but I like it!
 
Reply Like
  #14  
Old 03-26-2011, 05:02 PM
Gearhead3's Avatar
Gearhead3
Gearhead3 is offline
Road Captain
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 739
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default
OK, since nobody has mentioned it yet, I guess I'll go ahead and ask. Why did the tuner tune WOT at approx 14:1 A/F ratio instead of going for 13:1 ? I was always under the impression that the fuel injected bikes liked 13:1 AFR for best TQ/HP. Isn't 14:1 a little lean? Good numbers for sure, but I think there's some more HP/TQ to be had.
 
Last edited by Gearhead3; 03-26-2011 at 05:05 PM.
Reply Like
  #15  
Old 03-26-2011, 05:03 PM
denalion22's Avatar
denalion22
denalion22 is offline
Road Master
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 767
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default
Good question I'm ignorant to that.
 
Reply Like
  #16  
Old 03-26-2011, 05:44 PM
fireaxxe's Avatar
fireaxxe
fireaxxe is offline
Road Master
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Charlotte, N.C.
Posts: 997
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default
Originally Posted by denalion22
how did you gather that info... I gained more then that. if you are basing your info on the dyno chart ok...

But the two pulls that are shown on the chart are from several pulls not from the original stock pull. Hope that clarifies.

A stock 96 street glide has roughly 78hp and 92lbs...

I think my numbers 86hp to 102.5lbs is a great up grade and well worth the money considering I only payed 450 for a new 103 stage 2 including se 255 cams...

Money well spent for me.
Oh ok makes sense now, I though the comparison numbers was your baseline pull.
 
Reply Like
  #17  
Old 03-26-2011, 05:49 PM
fireaxxe's Avatar
fireaxxe
fireaxxe is offline
Road Master
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Charlotte, N.C.
Posts: 997
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default
Originally Posted by Gearhead3
OK, since nobody has mentioned it yet, I guess I'll go ahead and ask. Why did the tuner tune WOT at approx 14:1 A/F ratio instead of going for 13:1 ? I was always under the impression that the fuel injected bikes liked 13:1 AFR for best TQ/HP. Isn't 14:1 a little lean? Good numbers for sure, but I think there's some more HP/TQ to be had.
Thats what I was wondering about earlier with my first post, I though maybe the OP asked for a good tune with fuel mileage in mind. However this is still too lean for WOT if the ignition timing is close to the stage II settings.
 
Reply Like
  #18  
Old 03-26-2011, 06:55 PM
denalion22's Avatar
denalion22
denalion22 is offline
Road Master
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 767
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default
Originally Posted by fireaxxe
Thats what I was wondering about earlier with my first post, I though maybe the OP asked for a good tune with fuel mileage in mind. However this is still too lean for WOT if the ignition timing is close to the stage II settings.
I dunno. I wish I had a little more HP but Torque is most important. However with that said I wish the hp and lbs was very close to each other.

Other then thatI think the tune came out just fine...bike runs real good now
 
Reply Like
  #19  
Old 03-26-2011, 07:22 PM
SugsPa's Avatar
SugsPa
SugsPa is offline
Road Master
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Where The Bluegrass Grows
Posts: 945
Received 121 Likes on 56 Posts
Default
IMHO, you got one heck of a deal for $450.00. You'll have fun with that ride.

SugsPa
 
Reply Like
  #20  
Old 03-26-2011, 07:39 PM
denalion22's Avatar
denalion22
denalion22 is offline
Road Master
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 767
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default
Originally Posted by SugsPa
IMHO, you got one heck of a deal for $450.00. You'll have fun with that ride.

SugsPa
Thanks man ya I dig it a lot right now. Kinda wish I would have upgraded the cam so my hp would have matched my torque numbers. But it's cool for now.
 
Reply Like



Advanced Search
Quick Reply: Dyno Results 07 SG 103 Stage 2 SE255


Reply Closed Thread Share
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:33 PM.