Touring Models Road King, Road King Custom, Road King Classic, Road Glide, Street Glide, Electra Glide, Electra Glide Classic, and Electra Glide Ultra Classic bikes.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Performance vs Economy

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 11-13-2010 | 09:14 PM
producer's Avatar
producer
Thread Starter
|
Road Master
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 853
Likes: 4
From: Mnpls MN
Post Performance vs Economy

This thread is not necassarily for baggers. I put it here because I own a bagger.

Ok, I wanted to open a discussion with four questions and it's not limited to just these questions because I understand that certain engine configurations can and do have an effect on what will be discussed. I'm hoping those types of configurations will be talked about. So HERE we go!

1) After dyno tuning for performance, did your gas mileage remain the same, get better or go down?
2) With those performance gains, did your bike run better and or was it smoother?
3) Did the performance gains from your dyno tune over shadow any gas mileage issues?
4) Can you get exceptional performance and good gas mileage?
 

Last edited by producer; 11-13-2010 at 09:17 PM.
  #2  
Old 11-13-2010 | 09:21 PM
1931jamesw's Avatar
1931jamesw
Ultimate HDF Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 6,682
Likes: 12
Default

1. I went from a stage one to 255 cams and my fuel mileage increased slightly.
2. Definately smoother with better throttle response and less engine heat.
3. No. Most people ride harder (accelerate harder) after getting performance mods but if you try to ride as you normally do, you could increase fuel economy unless you build something more radical than the average guys perfomance upgrades.
4. Absolutely.
 
  #3  
Old 11-13-2010 | 10:40 PM
Mike's Avatar
Mike
Ultimate HDF Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 6,787
Likes: 38
From: Centralia, Wa
Default

Originally Posted by 1931jamesw
No. Most people ride harder (accelerate harder) after getting performance mods but
too true....

definitely more fun, though
 
  #4  
Old 11-13-2010 | 10:45 PM
BigDaddyMike's Avatar
BigDaddyMike
Club Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,335
Likes: 0
From: Tidewater
Default

1. If I ride conservatively I get better than average mileage (44-48highway) if not oh well.
2. Better pulling and smoother top end
3. Don't really understand the ? I didn't have any mileage issues to start.
4. Yes I think so!
 
  #5  
Old 11-14-2010 | 08:26 AM
StreetGlider57's Avatar
StreetGlider57
Road Master
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 960
Likes: 1
From: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Default

Originally Posted by producer
1) After dyno tuning for performance, did your gas mileage remain the same, get better or go down?
2) With those performance gains, did your bike run better and or was it smoother?
3) Did the performance gains from your dyno tune over shadow any gas mileage issues?
4) Can you get exceptional performance and good gas mileage?
I went from an 88" to a 95" so my comparisons include more than just a performance dyno.

1) I had a slight drop in mileage, but nothing too major. I still get in the mid 40's when I measure the mileage which is when I going on a road trip.
2) It runs better, especially at higher speeds and rpms.
3) Yes. I ride two up a lot and with the upgrades there is no hesitation when accelerating when the bike is fully loaded.
4) I'd say no. One is going to suffer and the expense of the other. This does not mean you can't have good perforance and get good mileage too, but the more you strive to get into that "exceptional" range, then one is going to suffer at the expenense of the other.
 
  #6  
Old 11-14-2010 | 09:58 AM
glide2005's Avatar
glide2005
Supporter
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,196
Likes: 9
From: Shenandoah, TX
Default

On my old 05 EGC, I had an 98" big bore. 94 HP, 113 lb tq and and 5 speed, up to 45 mpg.

Now have stock 10 EGC. 96" six speed and mid 40's on mpg.

Whats wrong with this picture. All I gained was a new payment, with less miles.
 
  #7  
Old 11-14-2010 | 10:43 AM
harleytuner's Avatar
harleytuner
Outstanding HDF Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,253
Likes: 219
From: Fredericksburg, Va.
Default

Originally Posted by producer
1) After dyno tuning for performance, did your gas mileage remain the same, get better or go down?
2) With those performance gains, did your bike run better and or was it smoother?
3) Did the performance gains from your dyno tune over shadow any gas mileage issues?
4) Can you get exceptional performance and good gas mileage?

1) A good tune should not make your fuel economy go down. A FI bike can be tuned for both economy and performance. A higher performance bike works less to acheive the same goals. I.E. when you are on a trip and you have a 100HP bike, the bike isn't working as hard as, say, a stock bike. Now when you are getting on it, that's a differn't story. But then again, when you are giving it hell the last things you are worried about is fuel economy.

2) A bike should run better with performance improvments, kind've the point right?

3) Not on mine. Current set up is 110", 259E cams (soon to be T-man 662-1's), 10.8:1 compression, FatCat exhaust and SERT. Averaged 46 MPG from Indianapolis to Sandusky, Ohio packed with gear at an average speed of 89.2 MPH (GPS) so i'd say for me my fuel economy is fine.

4)Yeppers.

Good topic Producer. Thanks.
 
  #8  
Old 11-14-2010 | 10:46 AM
Faast Ed's Avatar
Faast Ed
Banned
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 7,580
Likes: 7
From: The Internet (& Dyer, Indiana)
Default

Originally Posted by producer
This thread is not necassarily for baggers. I put it here because I own a bagger.

Ok, I wanted to open a discussion with four questions and it's not limited to just these questions because I understand that certain engine configurations can and do have an effect on what will be discussed. I'm hoping those types of configurations will be talked about. So HERE we go!

1) After dyno tuning for performance, did your gas mileage remain the same, get better or go down?
2) With those performance gains, did your bike run better and or was it smoother?
3) Did the performance gains from your dyno tune over shadow any gas mileage issues?
4) Can you get exceptional performance and good gas mileage?

I get 40 - 45 mpg consistantly (never below 40mpg even riding hard).
104HP/114TQ SAE DJ250i.
 
  #9  
Old 11-14-2010 | 11:21 AM
PFWiz's Avatar
PFWiz
Stellar HDF Member
Veteran: Navy
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,410
Likes: 387
From: Northern, Ohio (Yuck!)
Default

I see a lot of people asking "if I do whatever engine mod will it effect my fuel mileage?" I don't understand why that is a major concern. No "normal" properly set up engine mod is going to effect fuel mileage by more than about 10% max. So instead of getting 200 miles between fill ups you might only get 180. Is that a major issue? If you don't have a peanut tank what does it matter?
I am honestly not trying to be a jerk, I just don't understand. Did any of us decide to buy a HD because it gets good mileage? It certainly wasn't one of my decision points....
 
  #10  
Old 11-14-2010 | 11:48 AM
BCSG's Avatar
BCSG
Tourer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 360
Likes: 37
From: canada
Default

[QUOTE
1) After dyno tuning for performance, did your gas mileage remain the same, get better or go down?
2) With those performance gains, did your bike run better and or was it smoother?
3) Did the performance gains from your dyno tune over shadow any gas mileage issues?
4) Can you get exceptional performance and good gas mileage?[/QUOTE]

I too, went from an 88" to 95".
1) It went down slightly. If I ride conservatively, then I really don't notice it.
2) It runs better.
3) Absolutley! Two up riding is far more enjoyable.
4) Exceptional Performance AND good gas mileage, I'd say No. You can get good/great performace but as mentioned, one will sacrifice the other. I had my bike tuned by a local very reputable tuner, and he said I could have gotten you better numbers on paper, but your gas mileage would suck. He said he tuned for right to edge of decent gas mileage.
 


Quick Reply: Performance vs Economy



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:33 PM.