Rush slash downs with 2.5" baffle
#1
Rush slash downs with 2.5" baffle
I have been looking for a set of slip ons for my 2011 SG 103 with a deep tone and quite frankly fairly loud pipes. My neighbor has a set of Rush slip ons (not sure what size baffle?) but they sound great with a little throttle. Has anyone here heard or use these pipes and if so what do you all think? Do I need an upgrade A/F, fuel controller if I use these pipes or can I just have the dealer re-flash the computer with a richer map.
Is 2.5" overkill? If so should I use a 2.25"? My other choice is 4" Rineharts but don't think they will be as loud or deep as the Rush pipes.
Is 2.5" overkill? If so should I use a 2.25"? My other choice is 4" Rineharts but don't think they will be as loud or deep as the Rush pipes.
#2
Been reading the posts left and seems like most like the 2" baffle. Not to little and then again not to much. The larger the baffle the less low end grunt. Having the 103 you should already have the AC, if all your changing are the pipes you should be alright the current map.
Last edited by Phat09flhx; 10-28-2010 at 08:45 PM.
#3
#5
If you were to call Rush, they would tell you they would recommend you use a 2" baffle on your stock engine. Unless you have a souped up mill you will loose some low end torgue with the larger baffles. Back pressure is a good thing when it comes to exhaust pipes. But not when it comes as a result of a catalytic converter, like so many unfortunates have today. Look out water jackets-good bye air cooled. It is like a speeding train coming down the track at us. Harley air cooled will soon be a thing of the past. Oh, Thank you Mr. EPA for all the things you do for us.
Government A-holes!
Government A-holes!
Last edited by texaswiz; 10-28-2010 at 09:24 PM.
#6
#7
Trending Topics
#9
#10