VERY interesting PC-V map test! Long, but worth it.
#21
Actually, the original map we provided had plenty of + timing thruout the map. I am not sure of what map you are running now after you had it dyno tuned but 1 degree is generally not going to make a measurable difference, let alone night and day results. I would be really interested to take a look at your map. Also note there is a fine line when adding timing some are not noting in this thread. With even the slightest amount of detonation the ECM will start pulling timing and you will be actually be running less advance. The ion knock sensors will pick up any signs of detonation and instantly reduce spark timing, most times well before the human ear can hear it. We can see this first hand on the dyno with our software and set the timing tables in our maps based on our datalogs.
__________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ __________
EDIT: RANDYTRO, here is the actual timing table from the map we provided. You can clearly see that there is +3 igntion advance thru the cruise range and +4 at WOT. I am not sure what your dyno tuner did with our map or if this has been changed. I have offered several times to help you in response to posts you have made on the forum, however I cannot help those who do not contact me or give me the opportunity.
__________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ __________
EDIT: RANDYTRO, here is the actual timing table from the map we provided. You can clearly see that there is +3 igntion advance thru the cruise range and +4 at WOT. I am not sure what your dyno tuner did with our map or if this has been changed. I have offered several times to help you in response to posts you have made on the forum, however I cannot help those who do not contact me or give me the opportunity.
__________________
Jamie Long / Fuel Moto USA
The USA's Leader V-Twin EFI & Performance www.fuelmotousa.com
Contact 920-423-3309
Email jamie@fuelmotousa.com
Jamie Long / Fuel Moto USA
The USA's Leader V-Twin EFI & Performance www.fuelmotousa.com
Contact 920-423-3309
Email jamie@fuelmotousa.com
Last edited by fuelmoto; 10-21-2010 at 10:07 AM. Reason: Added Timing Table
#22
For decades my tuning-by-ear strategy has always been to apply as much ignition advance as possible without detonation, as this theoretically maximizes mileage and cooling with the type of gas I select, all other factors being equal. But these newer vehicles with ion-discharge knock-sensing can evidently sense detonation before you hear it. I noticed that my bike with stock cams and Fuel Moto Power Package would detonate at roll-on with even a +1 in the cruise range, so I obviously didn't add any there.
However, I was able to add +4 after installing 255 cams, which was a surprise since CCP is increased and that should induce more detonation at those points. More goes into these things than meets the eye--like cam duration, etc.--so I added +3 in the cruise range and have never had any detonation. I figured 2° below audible detonation was a safe place to be and Jamie at Fuel Moto agreed with me. Mileage is as good as it can be with this setup so I've settled there, but have not changed any advance or AFR settings (using Auto-Tune) above 40% TP, as I want the power when I need it. I also haven't changed the ignition advance above 20% TP, which maximizes at +4° at 100% TP above about 3500 rpm. This are Fuel Moto's numbers based on their dyno results, so I figure they're maximized. The bike runs very strong, so they'll stay there.
I will say that I have played with advance settings from 0 to +3 in the cruise range and I cannot feel any difference in performance, throttle response, or engine temperatures measured (oil and front head). Of course I roll out of this range when accelerating, so I'm not sure what performance changes would be realized between 2-3k RPM and 5-15% TP. Thus, I don't understand these major performance improvements with modest timing changes, as it doesn't happen with my bike. OTOH I say if it works, do it.
However, I was able to add +4 after installing 255 cams, which was a surprise since CCP is increased and that should induce more detonation at those points. More goes into these things than meets the eye--like cam duration, etc.--so I added +3 in the cruise range and have never had any detonation. I figured 2° below audible detonation was a safe place to be and Jamie at Fuel Moto agreed with me. Mileage is as good as it can be with this setup so I've settled there, but have not changed any advance or AFR settings (using Auto-Tune) above 40% TP, as I want the power when I need it. I also haven't changed the ignition advance above 20% TP, which maximizes at +4° at 100% TP above about 3500 rpm. This are Fuel Moto's numbers based on their dyno results, so I figure they're maximized. The bike runs very strong, so they'll stay there.
I will say that I have played with advance settings from 0 to +3 in the cruise range and I cannot feel any difference in performance, throttle response, or engine temperatures measured (oil and front head). Of course I roll out of this range when accelerating, so I'm not sure what performance changes would be realized between 2-3k RPM and 5-15% TP. Thus, I don't understand these major performance improvements with modest timing changes, as it doesn't happen with my bike. OTOH I say if it works, do it.
Last edited by iclick; 10-21-2010 at 11:03 AM.
#25
I'm glad to see that this thread has been updated. My curiousity has been piqued and now I have a question. First, for those that have tweaked their timing tables....what octane (and brand) of gasoline are you running?? And for Jamie, do you tune with 91 octane, 93 octane, or ??? Just curious because I always try to run 93 (Mobil), when available, and am wondering if anything is being left on the table if your tuning is done with 91 octane. I realize that you have to provide a 'cushion' with your tunes to compensate for the occasional tank of crap gas we all eventually run across, but how much of a cushion are we talking about ?
#26
All three are 2009's. My girls' Street Glide, and my Electra & Roadie.
Randytro, very interesting. You mention yours wasn't advanced and only set to Zero's. Imagine having my maps that were sent to me with a smattering of negative numbers like -3 throughout. Hell, by comparison mine might have at least run somewhat OK if it weren't for all the -3's from just off idle to about 4000 RPM. I still have a couple minor issues, but I haven't been able to sit down and touch the bike in a little while. It has stalled a couple times, but NOWHERE near as bad as it was.
I disagree with the assertion that the knock sensors & ECM will pull the timing enough and/or quick enough so that we wouldn't hear it. Why? Because I will hear it all the time if I'm not conscious of my throttle hand during low RPM quick movements. It will ping if I just blip the throttle at a stop light, if I move my wrist fast enough. Of course, as soon as you learn that, you don't do that. I buffer my throttle inputs in a similar manner that a steering damper works on a sportbike, I mentally slow it down just a tick and she doesn't make a noise. I then throw that map into my Electra and it acts the pretty much the same. Obviously, it's the same map. If the knock sensors were that good or that quick, I wouldn't hear the pinging. As a side note, knowing there is ping potential at modest RPM's, I'll usually keep a bit more R's on the clock when I'm in environments that may necessitate quick acceleration.
Bottom line, good to see yours is finally better. Trust me, I KNOW your frustration!
Randytro, very interesting. You mention yours wasn't advanced and only set to Zero's. Imagine having my maps that were sent to me with a smattering of negative numbers like -3 throughout. Hell, by comparison mine might have at least run somewhat OK if it weren't for all the -3's from just off idle to about 4000 RPM. I still have a couple minor issues, but I haven't been able to sit down and touch the bike in a little while. It has stalled a couple times, but NOWHERE near as bad as it was.
I disagree with the assertion that the knock sensors & ECM will pull the timing enough and/or quick enough so that we wouldn't hear it. Why? Because I will hear it all the time if I'm not conscious of my throttle hand during low RPM quick movements. It will ping if I just blip the throttle at a stop light, if I move my wrist fast enough. Of course, as soon as you learn that, you don't do that. I buffer my throttle inputs in a similar manner that a steering damper works on a sportbike, I mentally slow it down just a tick and she doesn't make a noise. I then throw that map into my Electra and it acts the pretty much the same. Obviously, it's the same map. If the knock sensors were that good or that quick, I wouldn't hear the pinging. As a side note, knowing there is ping potential at modest RPM's, I'll usually keep a bit more R's on the clock when I'm in environments that may necessitate quick acceleration.
Bottom line, good to see yours is finally better. Trust me, I KNOW your frustration!
#27
IIRC HD's spec is 91-octane or more, so in most (all?) areas that means premium gas, as the middle grade is usually 89.
#28
Actually, the ion-discharge knock-sensing feature of the ECM can detect incipient knock before it is audible. That's why I set my ignition advance 2° below the point where I can hear detonation. IOW, mine pings at 5° at roll-on, so I have it set at 3° even though I hear nothing at 4°.
#29
*************
Jaimie I have called you guys several times and got nowhere. All the maps you sent had all "0", no timing changes at all. Maybe something happened and you ended up sending the wrong maps, I don't know, but there were no timing changes on the maps you sent me. Also, I did not respond to this thread to bash you, I explained what happened to me and how frustrating it is. You are a part of what has been happening and there is no way to get around that, most everyone else seems to love fuel moto, that has not been my experience. When I call you are quick to get me off the phone and nothing is resolved. I really don't care who did or didn't do whatever, all I want is for my bike to run good.
Having said that, my bike is still having issues after it warms up. All +1s across the board is better but still not right, I'm going to use the timing (Jamie) listed in this post and see what that does.
Jaimie I have called you guys several times and got nowhere. All the maps you sent had all "0", no timing changes at all. Maybe something happened and you ended up sending the wrong maps, I don't know, but there were no timing changes on the maps you sent me. Also, I did not respond to this thread to bash you, I explained what happened to me and how frustrating it is. You are a part of what has been happening and there is no way to get around that, most everyone else seems to love fuel moto, that has not been my experience. When I call you are quick to get me off the phone and nothing is resolved. I really don't care who did or didn't do whatever, all I want is for my bike to run good.
Having said that, my bike is still having issues after it warms up. All +1s across the board is better but still not right, I'm going to use the timing (Jamie) listed in this post and see what that does.
As far as the timing table in your map, the one I posted IS the timing table taken directly from the original map. This was also the table in the revised map I sent you, if you still have the email you can check it or I can reforward it to you. These were not the wrong maps, I have copies of the emails and have checked them, the revisions and our timing tables are right there. Are you sure you are loading the maps and using the software correctly?
Regardless, if you are having issues you are welcome to contact me as I have asked and I can spend as much time as we need to work on getting your bike running to your liking. I would really like to hear from you and welcome your call
Last edited by fuelmoto; 10-24-2010 at 04:39 PM.
#30
All three are 2009's. My girls' Street Glide, and my Electra & Roadie.
Randytro, very interesting. You mention yours wasn't advanced and only set to Zero's. Imagine having my maps that were sent to me with a smattering of negative numbers like -3 throughout. Hell, by comparison mine might have at least run somewhat OK if it weren't for all the -3's from just off idle to about 4000 RPM. I still have a couple minor issues, but I haven't been able to sit down and touch the bike in a little while. It has stalled a couple times, but NOWHERE near as bad as it was.
I disagree with the assertion that the knock sensors & ECM will pull the timing enough and/or quick enough so that we wouldn't hear it. Why? Because I will hear it all the time if I'm not conscious of my throttle hand during low RPM quick movements. It will ping if I just blip the throttle at a stop light, if I move my wrist fast enough. Of course, as soon as you learn that, you don't do that. I buffer my throttle inputs in a similar manner that a steering damper works on a sportbike, I mentally slow it down just a tick and she doesn't make a noise. I then throw that map into my Electra and it acts the pretty much the same. Obviously, it's the same map. If the knock sensors were that good or that quick, I wouldn't hear the pinging. As a side note, knowing there is ping potential at modest RPM's, I'll usually keep a bit more R's on the clock when I'm in environments that may necessitate quick acceleration.
Bottom line, good to see yours is finally better. Trust me, I KNOW your frustration!
Randytro, very interesting. You mention yours wasn't advanced and only set to Zero's. Imagine having my maps that were sent to me with a smattering of negative numbers like -3 throughout. Hell, by comparison mine might have at least run somewhat OK if it weren't for all the -3's from just off idle to about 4000 RPM. I still have a couple minor issues, but I haven't been able to sit down and touch the bike in a little while. It has stalled a couple times, but NOWHERE near as bad as it was.
I disagree with the assertion that the knock sensors & ECM will pull the timing enough and/or quick enough so that we wouldn't hear it. Why? Because I will hear it all the time if I'm not conscious of my throttle hand during low RPM quick movements. It will ping if I just blip the throttle at a stop light, if I move my wrist fast enough. Of course, as soon as you learn that, you don't do that. I buffer my throttle inputs in a similar manner that a steering damper works on a sportbike, I mentally slow it down just a tick and she doesn't make a noise. I then throw that map into my Electra and it acts the pretty much the same. Obviously, it's the same map. If the knock sensors were that good or that quick, I wouldn't hear the pinging. As a side note, knowing there is ping potential at modest RPM's, I'll usually keep a bit more R's on the clock when I'm in environments that may necessitate quick acceleration.
Bottom line, good to see yours is finally better. Trust me, I KNOW your frustration!
Again, you are welcome to contact me and I would be happy to help you optimize your timing/fuel tables and get your bike running awesome. I would really like to hear from you so I can help.
Last edited by fuelmoto; 10-24-2010 at 04:44 PM.