106 Dyno results
#11
08-22-2010 | 01:57 PM
Elite HDF Member
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 4,011
Likes: 297
From: Central Fl
#12
08-22-2010 | 04:48 PM
Thread Starter
|
Road Master
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 12
From: connecticut
I still say it's a weak performance for a 106 but that's just my opinion. Most 96's with modest headwork and a cam upgrade with a D&D FatCat achieve over 100 hp with a good tune. Surprised that a 106 (even with stock heads) can't achieve greater than 100hp with a competent tuner. I think you'd have to look long and hard to find another 106 that doesn't achieve over 100hp.
So long as you're happy with the return on the investment, that's all that should matter.
So long as you're happy with the return on the investment, that's all that should matter.
#13
08-22-2010 | 05:15 PM
Ultimate HDF Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,939
Likes: 3
From: TX
I still say it's a weak performance for a 106 but that's just my opinion. Most 96's with modest headwork and a cam upgrade with a D&D FatCat achieve over 100 hp with a good tune. Surprised that a 106 (even with stock heads) can't achieve greater than 100hp with a competent tuner. I think you'd have to look long and hard to find another 106 that doesn't achieve over 100hp.
My old HQ98 made 113/111. @ 10:1, and I am CERTAIN it would spank your 110.
Show us a Harley package with bigbore (that's all the 106 is) & cams that makes as much HP as the one in this thread. The Stage II S/E kit makes 85 ~ on a good day.
It's BigBore kit with a set of good bolt-in cams. It's not a "package", like you have.
If anyone should be looking for a better tune.... I think it's you.
_____________________
So Joe.....
How is the "rideability" now? I'm betting it's smooth & crisp on all conditions....???....
Last edited by PhilM; 08-22-2010 at 05:27 PM.
#14
08-22-2010 | 05:28 PM
Thread Starter
|
Road Master
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 12
From: connecticut
That's almost laughable from a guy with a 110 that has headwork, cams, & compression and only makes 111/113.
My old HQ98 made 113/111. @ 10:1, and I am CERTAIN it would spank your 110.
Show us a Harley package with bigbore (that's all the 106 is) & cams that makes as much HP as the one in this thread. The Stage II S/E kit makes 85 ~ on a good day.
It's BigBore kit with a set of good bolt-in cams. It's not a "package", like you have.
If anyone should be looking for a better tune.... I think it's you.
My old HQ98 made 113/111. @ 10:1, and I am CERTAIN it would spank your 110.
Show us a Harley package with bigbore (that's all the 106 is) & cams that makes as much HP as the one in this thread. The Stage II S/E kit makes 85 ~ on a good day.
It's BigBore kit with a set of good bolt-in cams. It's not a "package", like you have.
If anyone should be looking for a better tune.... I think it's you.
Phil.... Thanks for sayin what I was thinking.I was trying to be nice.LOL
#15
08-22-2010 | 05:34 PM
Road Master
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 793
Likes: 4
From: Beverly Hills, Fl. Swimmin pools. Movie stars
That's almost laughable from a guy with a 110 that has headwork, cams, & compression and only makes 111/113.
My old HQ98 made 113/111. @ 10:1, and I am CERTAIN it would spank your 110.
Show us a Harley package with bigbore (that's all the 106 is) & cams that makes as much HP as the one in this thread. The Stage II S/E kit makes 85 ~ on a good day.
It's BigBore kit with a set of good bolt-in cams. It's not a "package", like you have.
If anyone should be looking for a better tune.... I think it's you.
_____________________
So Joe.....
How is the "rideability" now? I'm betting it's smooth & crisp on all conditions....???....
My old HQ98 made 113/111. @ 10:1, and I am CERTAIN it would spank your 110.
Show us a Harley package with bigbore (that's all the 106 is) & cams that makes as much HP as the one in this thread. The Stage II S/E kit makes 85 ~ on a good day.
It's BigBore kit with a set of good bolt-in cams. It's not a "package", like you have.
If anyone should be looking for a better tune.... I think it's you.
_____________________
So Joe.....
How is the "rideability" now? I'm betting it's smooth & crisp on all conditions....???....
#16
08-22-2010 | 05:35 PM
Road Master
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 999
Likes: 7
From: Allentown,Pa.
I think that dip at 3500 is the Concentric baffle but those numbers look good to me,I'm waiting for a Concentric baffle now for my Fat Cat so how much quieter then the standard baffle is it? or to the stock exhaust sound how does it compare?
#17
08-22-2010 | 05:39 PM
Thread Starter
|
Road Master
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 12
From: connecticut
I never had anything other d&d baffle so I cant respond to that but Its way louder than stock and louder than the reinhart slip on I had before that. Its pretty dam loud when your on it.
#18
08-22-2010 | 05:44 PM
Ultimate HDF Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,939
Likes: 3
From: TX
As I understand it, the concentric baffle is for stock motors.
Joe ~ tell us about "rideability"..... you know... that smooth, crisp response ~ which is actually far more relevant than stupid numbers on a piece of toilet tissue....
#19
08-22-2010 | 05:46 PM
#20
08-22-2010 | 05:51 PM
Thread Starter
|
Road Master
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 12
From: connecticut
The bike is smooth from the time you let the clutch out to WFO. It rips from whatever throttle position you are in. Rob did a great job tuning these bikes. Im very pleased with the way they idle and perform.