Is 35MPG horrible, considering?
#21
#22
#23
That is me, but throw in some suburban driving for the daily commute. When I go on a longer ride with the local HOG chapter, it climbs to near 44-45MPG. Bone stock motor.
#24
#25
#27
I just checked mine two weeks ago. 42 MPG, running mostly 91 octane, 320lbs on the bike, 103", 255 cams, V&H True Duals, V&H Moster Ovals, 99ft lbs/89 HP, I sat in 6th gear at 55-60 mph up and down hills with the cruise on just to see if it would bog, no problems. That was a 280 mile afternoon.
#29
Just want to check in to see if the 35 mpg that I get is horrible or acceptable.
I have a 2009 Road King Classic. Stage 1 with SE air cleaner, V&H slip-on's, and a Fuelmoto-tuned PCV. I have no idea what mpg I was getting before the stage 1, as I never bothered to check it.
When I first got my tune from FM, I was still getting a little pinging, even with no timing advance. So Jamie richened it up just a tad (3%-5%, depending on TP and RPM). I've ran 2 tanks of 91 octane through it so far, and got just a tad over 35mpg each time.
I weigh about 290lbs. I ride my bike daily to work. One way is about 25 miles, half of which is city and half of which is 72-75mph on the highway.
On both tanks, I also had about 90 miles worth of 2-up with my wife on the highway, again about 72-75mph.
I wouldn't characterize my riding style as agressive, nor as a "sunday driver". I like to keep up with traffic.
Overall bike seems to be running good. No more pinging. Plugs and pipes look good (no soot or wetness).
What do you think?
I have a 2009 Road King Classic. Stage 1 with SE air cleaner, V&H slip-on's, and a Fuelmoto-tuned PCV. I have no idea what mpg I was getting before the stage 1, as I never bothered to check it.
When I first got my tune from FM, I was still getting a little pinging, even with no timing advance. So Jamie richened it up just a tad (3%-5%, depending on TP and RPM). I've ran 2 tanks of 91 octane through it so far, and got just a tad over 35mpg each time.
I weigh about 290lbs. I ride my bike daily to work. One way is about 25 miles, half of which is city and half of which is 72-75mph on the highway.
On both tanks, I also had about 90 miles worth of 2-up with my wife on the highway, again about 72-75mph.
I wouldn't characterize my riding style as agressive, nor as a "sunday driver". I like to keep up with traffic.
Overall bike seems to be running good. No more pinging. Plugs and pipes look good (no soot or wetness).
What do you think?
I get 48-49mpg at slower highway speeds using E10 93-octane and 45mpg at interstate speeds, but only 37mpg in city riding. I've done quite a bit of map tweaking, though, to get this far. Fuel Moto tunes for optimal performance and cooling, and although performance and mileage don't work at odds if tweaked properly, mileage and heat do work inversely proportional to one another. Adding an oil cooler may reduce engine temperatures enough to make a difference with detonation on the highway and should allow you to lean the cruise-range for better mileage. Adding a map switch to the PCV will enable you to switch to a richer map on the fly for helping to cool during those times you get stuck in summer traffic. There are all kinds of ways to juggle mileage, heat, and performance--and many are described in this forum. If you do it right you can have all of these virtues together.
Since you can't get 93-octane in your area I would suggest having it dyno-tuned, or start tweaking the fuel-adj. and ignition-timing tables yourself (cruise-range only) until you're happy with the result. This process isn't for everyone but if you try it be sure to save a copy of the original map to your computer in case you want to revert to it later.
Last edited by iclick; 06-15-2010 at 02:10 PM.
#30