Misinformed on 103 Build and Cams....
#51
No point in continuing I guess. Sorry Iclick, I thought you were more interested in working on your bike than just promoting a product. I've been very clear that I know nothing about the PCV, which is why I'm asking questions. I would have figured you were more interested in working with your fuel injection and ECM.
What's more, amidst the TTS promo, I also felt that you harbored some misconceptions about the PCV and I pointed them out, which is not promoting a product. Was I wrong in representing any of these points? I've tried to be helpful to the OP in this thread, as Tony and I go way back in discussions about the PCV, but if you enter a product-specific thread and make questionable remarks about that product you should expect to be challenged. If I have not represented the PCV or TTS accurately I would appreciate it if you would point out my errors rather than make general accusations that I'm here only to promote something.
Last edited by iclick; 04-10-2010 at 05:51 PM.
#52
OK, Keith isn't done with my new map yet, and it will be another 3 weeks or so till I get the 2-1-2 FM pipe. So I decided to do some experimenting today. I downloaded the one and only Stage 2 103 map that Power Commander had on their website. This is what I would call a power map as the highest AFR in the cruise range is set at 13.7
I opted to ride the map the way it was and let my auto tune do some work on it. I took off on about a 50 mile loop and took the laptop with me. After the Oil Temp got to 200 I stopped, looked at the trims, and accepted them. Performance was ok before the first stop, but after accepting trims I could tell it was a lot closer. I stopped twice more in that 50 mile loop and accepted trims each time. The last time I only had a few trims above 10. After accepting the last set of trims I rode about another 20 miles and the bike runs better now than ever before. I can feel more power, broader TQ curve, and no hesitation or pinging. The only thing I did manually to this map was add 10 to the 0% column for the fuel tables to eliminate a little decel popping and that worked very well.
Once I got home I decided to enter in my lean AFR's from my last map (14.4 in cruise) into this new map. I set max enleanment to 30 and max enrichment to 10. I took off around the same 50 mile loop as the first time. No issues whatsoever and the highest my oil temps got was 225 while sitting in traffic at 4 consecutive stop lights. Once rolling again the temps went right down to between 200-215, just where I like them to be.
I think once I get the pipe I will be able to go a little leaner again for better mileage, but I also believe opening up the restrictive exhaust is going to deliver a few more HP/TQ. I'm happy with it for now, but I still want that pipe.
I opted to ride the map the way it was and let my auto tune do some work on it. I took off on about a 50 mile loop and took the laptop with me. After the Oil Temp got to 200 I stopped, looked at the trims, and accepted them. Performance was ok before the first stop, but after accepting trims I could tell it was a lot closer. I stopped twice more in that 50 mile loop and accepted trims each time. The last time I only had a few trims above 10. After accepting the last set of trims I rode about another 20 miles and the bike runs better now than ever before. I can feel more power, broader TQ curve, and no hesitation or pinging. The only thing I did manually to this map was add 10 to the 0% column for the fuel tables to eliminate a little decel popping and that worked very well.
Once I got home I decided to enter in my lean AFR's from my last map (14.4 in cruise) into this new map. I set max enleanment to 30 and max enrichment to 10. I took off around the same 50 mile loop as the first time. No issues whatsoever and the highest my oil temps got was 225 while sitting in traffic at 4 consecutive stop lights. Once rolling again the temps went right down to between 200-215, just where I like them to be.
I think once I get the pipe I will be able to go a little leaner again for better mileage, but I also believe opening up the restrictive exhaust is going to deliver a few more HP/TQ. I'm happy with it for now, but I still want that pipe.
#53
#54
You should be ready now for the map switch, and that in combo with the oil cooler should put you in about as good a position as you can be in for getting best mileage and optimal cooling at your beck and call.
What kind of trims are you seeing? I have some really large negatives in some places, but I'm using a richer base map and leaner targets. I'm seeing all double-digit negatives up to -31, but mostly -10 to -20.
I'll be borrowing an LCD-200 next week to test for a while and will report how it works. It gives read-outs on PCV info, including head temp, real-time AFR's, etc.; does data logging onto an SD card; and accepts multiple maps. I won't be using the last feature since I'm in good shape with the map switch, but my biggest problem is figuring out where to mount it.
#55
You did it right but didn't really need to "accept trims" more than once to establish that rich base map. There is no advantage to doing it multiple times since AT uses the sum of the base-map and trim tables and larger trims don't affect its reaction time or accuracy. For example, if you see a "10" in one trim cell and you have "15" in the base map, the net is "25". When AT arrives at this point in RPM/TP it instantly accepts "25" as the value, then trims further in accordance with the output of the O2 sensors and your target AFR's. If you accept trims you'll have "25" in the base map, which is the same thing.
I'll be borrowing an LCD-200 next week to test for a while and will report how it works. It gives read-outs on PCV info, including head temp, real-time AFR's, etc.; does data logging onto an SD card; and accepts multiple maps. I won't be using the last feature since I'm in good shape with the map switch, but my biggest problem is figuring out where to mount it.
#56
#57
For those of you that were interested in the SE-255 cams I was getting in.....
They came in damaged from **** poor packaging. I have contacted the seller and will be shipping them back as soon as I am refunded my money.
Sorry, but you'll have to look elsewhere. Watch out on e-bay!
They came in damaged from **** poor packaging. I have contacted the seller and will be shipping them back as soon as I am refunded my money.
Sorry, but you'll have to look elsewhere. Watch out on e-bay!
Damn! There's no way you could chip a tooth off of a cam in shipping! Is there? Well, maybe if the UPS truck ran over the box. That's amazing. Are these the replacements for the stock cams the schmuck sent you before? If so, Ebay should ban that sucker. Most people are getting good cams on Ebay. A friend just got a cherry set used for $150, which is about the going price these days (used), more for new ones.
Last edited by iclick; 04-13-2010 at 10:27 PM.
#58
I had a "service manager" tell me recently that only one helmet mounting screw comes with each of the two 09 Ultra headsets that come with the bike. (there were two missing from my kit)
Sheesh- there are two holes in each headset mount and if you used one screw in each headset they would fall off the helmets!
I just shook my head and went to the hardware store and bought 2 to replace the 2 that were missing. It wasn't worth my time to argue the point...
#59
#60
As long as it frees up the exhaust flow better than it is now, I think I'll be good. Not like I have a serious Hi-Po motor or anything.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post