Touring Models Road King, Road King Custom, Road King Classic, Road Glide, Street Glide, Electra Glide, Electra Glide Classic, and Electra Glide Ultra Classic bikes.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

111hp/115ft lbs...should I be disappointed?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #71  
Old 03-24-2010, 03:53 PM
Badbagger's Avatar
Badbagger
Badbagger is offline
Grand HDF Member
Veteran: Air Force
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,384
Received 323 Likes on 190 Posts
Default

Personally, numbers don't mean a whole lot to me. I go by the seat of my pants dyno. Your seat of your pants dyno seems quite happy unless I am all wet here.
 
  #72  
Old 03-24-2010, 05:54 PM
WhiteGoldSG's Avatar
WhiteGoldSG
WhiteGoldSG is offline
Road Master
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,017
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Heatwave, IMO, based solely on the research I have done for my own build and the many tuners i have talked to, the 58mm TB may be a little bloated for your build. Scott, who did my headwork, suggested i go with a 58, but every tuner I talked to told me to stay with the 50 and see what we get on the dyno. They all thought it might be a bloated pig and affect my numbers overall. I have an 08 with the hillside 107 stage 4 build. I just ordered my fatcat with perf wrapped baffle and my bike goes out to dave at JD's on april 1st to get tuned, so I shall see what is what then. What I dont understand is that you say Dave does not tune with SEST!? I run an SEPST, and Dave is well aware of that. He is tuning mine, he even went as far as to tell me that he may keep it another day and have it on the dyno a little longer because it is a little more complex to tune using that tuner. Are you positive about this? I am going to call Dave in the AM just to make sure of this again.
 
  #73  
Old 03-24-2010, 06:06 PM
WhiteGoldSG's Avatar
WhiteGoldSG
WhiteGoldSG is offline
Road Master
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,017
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ghostej morrow
You may want to use the MASTER TUNER instead of the super tuner. I would stay away from a power commander.The MASTER TUNER is more infinitely variable than the super tuner and can fine tune more presicely. That being said,I think you have a great package.

Duuuuuude...leave the mans package out of this...he was talking about his motor! LOL...JK
 
  #74  
Old 03-24-2010, 06:22 PM
ashmarc's Avatar
ashmarc
ashmarc is offline
Road Master
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 1,223
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Thanks.......now I have a headache.

I am soooooooooo glad I don't play this game, good lord.
 
  #75  
Old 03-24-2010, 07:01 PM
makstv5's Avatar
makstv5
makstv5 is offline
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: massachusetts
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Enjoy your HD touring bike

You want to go fast? I have a Busa for sale. All the money in the world isn't going to give you the thrill that bike will lay on you.
 
  #76  
Old 03-24-2010, 07:16 PM
kstang71's Avatar
kstang71
kstang71 is offline
Advanced
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Wesley Chapel, Florida
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

Money..Money..Money.. I don't know maaaan.. where does it end?? You buy a harley..You get a rope too. You buy pipes, you get another rope..You buy cams.... guess what? ......... You get another rope. The dyno.... well, I don't think that comes with a rope, that one is a vacuum sucking your pockets dry.. I spent 2k with my set-up and I cut that fricken rope. These are questions you have to ask yourself to figure out where the spending ends.. How does it run? Is it dependable? Does it look and perform better that your buddies that you ride with? And last but not least........ Do you like how it rides?

I know...I know... The spending can never stop with a harley because there is always going to be something new to try or just one more piece of chrome to bolt on... Just jealous of all the money spilling all over this thread.....
 
  #77  
Old 03-24-2010, 07:18 PM
qtrracer's Avatar
qtrracer
qtrracer is offline
Ultimate HDF Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SoCal
Posts: 6,532
Received 131 Likes on 104 Posts
Talking

Originally Posted by makstv5
You want to go fast? I have a Busa for sale. All the money in the world isn't going to give you the thrill that bike will lay on you.
*ussy Bike!
 
  #78  
Old 03-24-2010, 07:23 PM
qtrracer's Avatar
qtrracer
qtrracer is offline
Ultimate HDF Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SoCal
Posts: 6,532
Received 131 Likes on 104 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by qtrracer
*ussy Bike!
I say this because almost every sportbike rider assumes that a guy that owns a Harley hasn't ridden anything fast , trust me alot of us have plenty of experience on very fast bikes, but makstv5 is right about "enjoy your touring bike" because that is what is all about and if making it faster makes you enjoy it more, have at it!!!
 
  #79  
Old 03-24-2010, 07:38 PM
arealinvestor's Avatar
arealinvestor
arealinvestor is offline
Road Master
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Trenton,N.J.
Posts: 868
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I have a 2010 SE Ultra. I dynoed the stock engine before making engine upgrades. The stock 110 was putting out 77hp/100 ftlbs from the factory on the dealer's dynojet.





I made the following engine upgrades:
  • headwork done by Hillside (10.5 comp)
  • upgraded the injectors to 5.3 gm/sec
  • swapped the 50mmThrottlebody for the larger 58mm TB
  • replaced the stock air cleaner with the ventilator air cleaner
  • installed roller rockers
  • installed Woods 408-6 cams
  • removed the exhaust Cat and replaced the baffles with Fullsac 2.25" performance baffles
  • installed the SuperTuner
After dyno tuning this setup, the performance was improved to 107hp/108ft lbs. Almost all the 110 engines with this exact build are generating over 120hp and 120ft lbs. The main difference between my build and the other 110s were the exhaust (2:1 vs my 2:2) and all of the other bikes were 2009 and older.My bike performed excellent above 2500rpms but was definitely soft below 2500rpms.


I decided to upgrade the exhaust and installed the D&D Fat Cat Boss 2:1. Bike was tuned again (dealer offered at no charge after his techs returned from Harley tech school last week). The techs that did the tuning said they have maxed out the ST's limits and there's no more room to improve the performance.

As you can see from the dyno below they did a great job tuning the bike in terms of AFR. 111hp/115ft lbs. Nice broad torque band with 100ft lbs or more from 2700-5700 rpms. It pulls strong all the way to 6000.

The bike rides incredible. Endless torque everywhere. The throttle "pulls" to the rev limiter. Its an explosive ride with excellent slow speed throttle handling. It's everything I thought it would be OTHER than appearing to be delivering far less performance on paper than other identical builds.






Here's my questions:
  • Is the overall HP held back by going to the 58mm TB? I still have the 50mm and could reinstall. The techs and Harley believe the 58mm is too big for a 110 but I struggle to see how it would reduce high end HP. If handling was poor I could blame the 58 but that isn't an issue.
  • Is the problem with the tuning software? To date I have yet to see a single 2010 110 that is able to perform better than the graph below. Other tuning shops believe the problem is the new 2010 ST software which is different from the past versions and is not allowing engines to be tuned to their full potential. Some tuners are suggesting I may need to piggy back a Power Commander or other tuning software on top of the ST if my goal is more power.
  • Am I leaving alot of performance on the "table"? Should I be disappointed that the engine doesn't appear to be delivering the same level of performance that identical 110 builds from 2009 and older were capable of?
  • I'm not really hung up on paper performance other than the fact that it appears to be so much less than other bikes with the identical engine build, which has me wondering how great the performance would be with 10+ more hp and ft-lbs.
What do others think? Is anyone else struggling to get more power out of their 2010 110 engine build or is it just me? Has anyone been able to get more Hp/Tq from a naturally aspirated 2010 110" engine? All constructive feedback welcome.
Did you Tell Scott what cam to set those heads up for?? At 10.5 you might be a bit light on comp for that cam with that lift.I would think you might be able to squeeze it for 10.8-11.0 comp.That cam is more of a tq cam.I would run an open element A/C kit with those heads & cam.I would also switch out that Super tuner for the TTS Mastertuner.I think there is more in that build.Call Dave over at JD's Cycleworks & see what he can do for you.I'm almost certain he will find more in the build.If not he will tell you how to get more!!Also the 58mm could be sent to HPI for them to clean it up for better flow.Scott is pretty good with heads,but you have to tell him what you want to run with the heads!!! Also,what baffle on the Fatcat Boss are you running with this build?? You should be running the Big Boar(perforated)baffle!!! Anything else will kill the HP!!! JMHOP
 

Last edited by arealinvestor; 03-24-2010 at 07:48 PM.
  #80  
Old 03-24-2010, 08:11 PM
producer's Avatar
producer
producer is offline
Road Master
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mnpls MN
Posts: 853
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

My personal opinion: That 58 MM TB is too much for that build. A/F velocity is holding him back. A smaller diameter TB would give more Torque first and the HP will follow.
One other thing to look at; If your VE's values per cylinder are not resonably close after tuning, I would look at getting a cylinder pressure and leak down test done. When I say close, I mean averaging a 10% difference accross all the cells. I'm assuming that the gentleman has a good exhaust system on this bike. If he doesn't, that will hurt the VE values like, well everyone knows that.

Originally Posted by arealinvestor
Did you Tell Scott what cam to set those heads up for?? At 10.5 you might be a bit light on comp for that cam with that lift.I would think you might be able to squeeze it for 10.8-11.0 comp.That cam is more of a tq cam.I would run an open element A/C kit with those heads & cam.I would also switch out that Super tuner for the TTS Mastertuner.I think there is more in that build.Call Dave over at JD's Cycleworks & see what he can do for you.I'm almost certain he will find more in the build.If not he will tell you how to get more!!Also the 58mm could be sent to HPI for them to clean it up for better flow.Scott is pretty good with heads,but you have to tell him what you want to run with the heads!!! Also,what baffle on the Fatcat Boss are you running with this build?? You should be running the Big Boar(perforated)baffle!!! Anything else will kill the HP!!! JMHOP
 

Last edited by producer; 03-24-2010 at 08:24 PM. Reason: more information.


Quick Reply: 111hp/115ft lbs...should I be disappointed?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:31 PM.