Touring Models Road King, Road King Custom, Road King Classic, Road Glide, Street Glide, Electra Glide, Electra Glide Classic, and Electra Glide Ultra Classic bikes.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Performance mods for 2010 FLHTK

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 01-09-2010 | 11:53 AM
Bushrider's Avatar
Bushrider
Thread Starter
|
Tourer
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
From: Northern BC, Canada
Default Performance mods for 2010 FLHTK

Well I finally bit the bullet and put the $$$ out for a down payment. Went with the flame blue/black colors.
I test rode an 09 ultra last summer and wasn't real impressed with the power. In sixth it's a bit of a joke.
Anyway, I'm expecting that the 103 will have more but with me and the OL (combined we're about 350 lbs+) and a lot of long-haul gear (she's not a light packer) I may be wanting to step it up a notch.
Can anyone recommend some cheap initial mods for consideration?
Keep in mind that with provincial and federal taxes, plus some comfort mods (hwy pegs, ws bags, grab handle for the OL), I'm going to be dropping CDN$35k. And we ain't rich people.
I just want to know if there's any easy way to ensure it's there when I need to roll it on hard.
Thanks, folks.
 
  #2  
Old 01-09-2010 | 12:22 PM
chance's Avatar
chance
Club Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 5,315
Likes: 1
From: Northern CA
Default

Hey Congrats on the new Limited ! I think you will be happy with the color choice...
 
  #3  
Old 01-09-2010 | 12:59 PM
vtxkc's Avatar
vtxkc
Advanced
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 85
Likes: 2
From: Kansas City
Default

If you look at Fuel Moto's website and look at their Stage 1 packages you will see that there really isn't much difference in the 96" vs the 103" motor. At the most 2 hp. It shows the 96" motor at 79.35 HP and the 103" motor at 80.69 HP after the stage 1 install. I really doubt you can feel that in the seat of your pants. A 14 HP increase over stock from the 96" motor. Very impressive, I would have expected more out of the 103" motor. Torque on the 96" was 91 and the 103" was 97. Once again, I doubt you can feel the difference.
 
  #4  
Old 01-09-2010 | 03:25 PM
'05Train's Avatar
'05Train
Ultimate HDF Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 7,439
Likes: 883
From: 'Noke, VA
Default

2:1 pipe, new A/C, TTS with a dyno tune. That'll wake it right up, and run roughly $1600-$1800 USD. Skip the dyno and VTune it yourself, you can save $300-$400.
 
  #5  
Old 01-15-2010 | 04:03 AM
MNHD's Avatar
MNHD
Intermediate
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: Ontario Canada
Default

Originally Posted by vtxkc
If you look at Fuel Moto's website and look at their Stage 1 packages you will see that there really isn't much difference in the 96" vs the 103" motor. At the most 2 hp. It shows the 96" motor at 79.35 HP and the 103" motor at 80.69 HP after the stage 1 install. I really doubt you can feel that in the seat of your pants. A 14 HP increase over stock from the 96" motor. Very impressive, I would have expected more out of the 103" motor. Torque on the 96" was 91 and the 103" was 97. Once again, I doubt you can feel the difference.
My thoughts exactly. Only way to wake the 103 up is to get rid of the stock cams and front headpipe. I'm looking at putting in Andrews 54 cams, TTS, and Fulsac headpipe.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mchad
The Dyno Room
28
12-27-2016 09:34 PM
Jdharley78
Engine Mechanical Topics
34
08-16-2015 06:55 PM
KWC6
Touring Models
20
01-06-2013 05:34 PM
Blakerea
Dyna Glide Models
25
05-16-2012 05:32 PM
Oil Consultant
Touring Models
6
02-13-2012 05:54 PM



Quick Reply: Performance mods for 2010 FLHTK



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:17 PM.