While I agree that the double Timkin tapered bearing setup is superior to the rollers now in use, the current set up is still more than adequate for stock and moderately modified motors. The weak point in the low end is the pressed together flywheel assembly. Your chances of flywheel scissoring is far greater than a bearing failure. By the way the "Timken" brand cam bearings aren't tapered, they are just the old Torrington bearing. Apples and oranges. Timken bought or merged with Torrington and they are branded Timken, there the similarity ends.
I was talking to a Timken Rep. last year about this, and he said it all came down to money. HD wanted the Timken bearings for next to nothing, and Timken refused to give them away............so they parted ways.
Does anyone know the build date when they made this change? I have an 03 softail but the build date is 9/02. I would love to know if it might be the old style
was always curious why they quit using the timken bearing in the motor after 2002? was it just being there greedy usual ornery bs or so robots could assemble the motors? doesn't make sense.
It makes sense, if you realize that corporate America are all greedy basturds!
I wouldn't purchase a new bike because they are built like crap and are not built to last!
Last edited by fxdwg_rugby; 01-03-2010 at 03:42 PM.
Reason: n
Its more a matter of assembly line proceedure than actual costs. It takes much longer to set precision end play than it does to stab a shft through a hole. Same reason for the chain drive cams as opposed to the gear drive set up from past motors. When production numbers go up in any manufacturing facility you have to find ways to do it quicker!
Time = Money. It's still a matter of them being cheap bastards. I would rather have a well built motor then one built on some bean counters assembly line.