getting ready to buy a set of slipons.

of those who have heard both, how much difference and HOW are they different ?

thanks

DK

 

Rineharts are gonna be a little louder. However, Rineharts have a nice deep tone. Mine really sound good since I did the cams. Before the cams I thought they were a hair too quiet

 

I have listened to both. The Rhineharts were louder but that is the only difference. Both have a deap tone and they both sound good. I ended up with the Jackpots. Mainly due to how I am treated with Fuel Moto. I figured if I did not like them I could sell them and go with the Rhineharts. My bike still has the Jackpots and I am so pleased with sound performance and appearance.

 

Rineharts are hard to beat love mine I recieve comments on them all the time. but as I always say to each his own

 

Similar question. I have old SE II''s and SE 255 cams. Got a little louder when I put the new cams in. Not bad, but am considering a new set of slip ons.

Candidates: Dyno-tuned Jackpots or Rineharts

Anyone have experience with the SE IIs and either option. Wondering how they would sound compared to the SE IIs and if you saw any performance gains going away from the SE IIs?

 

Sounds like my situation.
103", 253 cams, older style SE slip-ons, way too loud. Johnny laws has made it know that it's a problem. I'd like to put something on that is nice and deep and not too loud. Cheap would be nice too.
How much are the Jackpots.

 

I heard them both and went with the Rineharts on the Ultra. The Rineharts were louder and had a deeper tone.

 

Ultra-Rick... which ones did you hear besides the Rineharts? And how much louder.. a little or a lot? As Wally was saying, the SE IIs are pretty loud and I'm thinking about getting something a little quieter but deep throaty sound.

Just wasn't clear on your post, when you said you'd heard both since we have talked about 3 slip-ons.

Thnaks

 

Rineharts here.

 

I went with the rineharts on my 09 nice deep tone and got a real good deal on some take offs