Touring Models Road King, Road King Custom, Road King Classic, Road Glide, Street Glide, Electra Glide, Electra Glide Classic, and Electra Glide Ultra Classic bikes.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Cam for bagger...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 10-12-2009, 11:38 AM
gearheadfmc's Avatar
gearheadfmc
gearheadfmc is offline
Cruiser
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 123
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bikergeoff
S&S 570's would be my first choice.
Thanks...

Any reason why?
 
  #12  
Old 10-12-2009, 11:45 AM
gearheadfmc's Avatar
gearheadfmc
gearheadfmc is offline
Cruiser
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 123
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jamesw
Do you know if there's a high lift spring kit installed in the heads? That may be a factor in cam selection.
JamesSW

How about your combo here?

Any input/advice on the 54?
 
  #13  
Old 10-12-2009, 11:57 AM
bikergeoff's Avatar
bikergeoff
bikergeoff is offline
Road Master
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Just South of Detroit, MI
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Simply put, S&S makes a great product, but I know what they can do in the build you are working on. The S&S570's come in early for a great low-end punch, and with the head work and pipe you have the bike should pull like a freight train until you hit the rev limiter. I helped a close friend of mine do a build similar to what you're doing and his bike runs away from any 95" build with screamin' eagle cams and heads.
 

Last edited by bikergeoff; 10-12-2009 at 11:59 AM.
  #14  
Old 10-12-2009, 12:12 PM
gearheadfmc's Avatar
gearheadfmc
gearheadfmc is offline
Cruiser
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 123
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks.... do yo know what compression your buddy set for that cam?
 
  #15  
Old 10-12-2009, 12:19 PM
gunnert's Avatar
gunnert
gunnert is offline
Road Captain
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 749
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

The 570s would be my choice "if" your compression is over 10:1. Closer to 10.5:1 would be even better. I ran a set of those cams in a 95" Road King for about 50K miles. Bike made 96 Hp and 106 lbft Tq. Was a GREAT performer.
 
Attached Thumbnails Cam for bagger...-p5070287.jpg  
  #16  
Old 10-12-2009, 12:29 PM
gearheadfmc's Avatar
gearheadfmc
gearheadfmc is offline
Cruiser
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 123
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gunnert
The 570s would be my choice "if" your compression is over 10:1. Closer to 10.5:1 would be even better. I ran a set of those cams in a 95" Road King for about 50K miles. Bike made 96 Hp and 106 lbft Tq. Was a GREAT performer.
Would that be "corrected" compression?

At 10.5..... might have some pinging with the rotten California 91 gas....?
 
  #17  
Old 10-12-2009, 02:34 PM
maineultraclassic's Avatar
maineultraclassic
maineultraclassic is offline
Elite HDF Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Biddeford, Maine
Posts: 4,722
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

If you are around 10:1 CR, then I would go with either the Woods TW-6 or TW-6H.
If you are around 10.5:1 CR, I would go with the Woods TW-5.

With the proper tune, you will be fine on 91 octane with whatever build you go with.

Steve
 
  #18  
Old 10-12-2009, 03:45 PM
jamesw's Avatar
jamesw
jamesw is offline
Road Warrior
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,626
Received 740 Likes on 276 Posts
Default

I have the 54's, and like them. They are supposed to be happier with the higher compression pistons I installed. I'm getting 87hp and 101 torque; but your numbers may vary. My heads were ported and polished for street use, and I stayed with stock valve sizes, so the air thruput may be different. It all depends on what you are looking to get out of your build; I wanted more bottom end torque.
 
  #19  
Old 10-12-2009, 03:54 PM
ryanl's Avatar
ryanl
ryanl is offline
Tourer
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern NC
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by maineultraclassic
If your heads are setup to handle 575 lift cams, you might want to look at the Woods TW-5......it is a great torque cam with a higher lift. But you will need to set the compression at or around 10.5:1 to make them work right. To do that, you'll need to have your heads CC'ed and milled and also measure your deck height so you can know for sure what you are working with.

Woods TW-6 is another great choice, and is a bolt-in .510 lift cam, it likes 10:1 compression.

Steve
Both great cams. Im running the 6 and have no complaints.
Like maine said target compression would be 10.1-2:1
It works suprisingly well for a bolt in cam. Mine hits hard (breaks 100ftlbs) at 2500rpm and doesnt fall below until 5700rpm. By then the HP is already above 100. 6200rpm (rev limiter) comes quick.
Dont do much downshifting with a powerband like that

Get decent fuel here, but also miserable heat/humidity in the summer.
No pinging/detonation problems whatsoever.
 

Last edited by ryanl; 10-12-2009 at 03:56 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ChangedBagger
Engine Mechanical Topics
13
03-15-2015 08:01 PM
adm
Engine Mechanical Topics
7
02-07-2015 01:56 PM
blue flht
Touring Models
26
02-15-2013 07:02 AM
Fxdxt-I
Exhaust System Topics
9
02-05-2013 07:30 AM
02BlueDeuce
Exhaust System Topics
6
11-10-2012 07:49 PM



Quick Reply: Cam for bagger...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:20 AM.