Touring Models Road King, Road King Custom, Road King Classic, Road Glide, Street Glide, Electra Glide, Electra Glide Classic, and Electra Glide Ultra Classic bikes.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Ride report...after 255 install on 96 incher

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #61  
Old 10-13-2009 | 05:04 PM
cmashark's Avatar
cmashark
Thread Starter
|
Road Warrior
Veteran: Navy
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,496
Likes: 209
From: Atoka, TN
Default

Originally Posted by boogaloodude
btw... Which fuelpak map did you use for this setup?
fp-2490
 
  #62  
Old 10-13-2009 | 05:29 PM
07fatboycustom's Avatar
07fatboycustom
Cruiser
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
From: olathe, ks
Default

I had an 07 Fatboy. 96ci. with V&H big shots, power commander and SE heavy breather.
Had my dealer install an HQ 103 kit. Mileage dropped to about 37/38 hwy. But was extremely pleased with the power. Results were 106hp and 115tq. The bike really got it on. The cost was about $3400.00 total for the dealer to do this install. They do bike from states all around. They are located in Topeka, KS if anyone is interested. Just tell Rick in service that a guy named Rick recommended them. He will take care of you. I now ride an 2010 Road King.
 
  #63  
Old 10-14-2009 | 03:35 PM
KaponeWKYA's Avatar
KaponeWKYA
Tourer
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 474
Likes: 3
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

Originally Posted by iclick
TD's will be counter-productive, as they will reduce low-end TQ, and increasing TQ is why you are supposedly installing the 255's in the first place. The only issue with you is to find a FP map that will be right for your combo, and I'm not sure the best way to go about that. You don't need PCV (with or without AT) or SEST to make the 255's work, although both would provide more flexibility in tuning.

I know the TD's aren't as good for low end TQ as 2:1, but I didn't think it'd hurt so much that it would negate the 255s...is this correct?

I don't think so, but I'm not knowledgeable about the scope of the FP. I would call Jamie at Fuel Moto and quiz him about it, as they sell most every tuner except SEST, which is a Harley product. If they have a map for your exact setup, which I think is doubtful, you would be set by just spending $300 on a PCV. AT would definitely do it for you, but at $300 more may not be in your budget.

My understanding about SEST is that there are few canned maps available, and mostly (all?) for HD products like SE mufflers. I doubt if your dealer will be able to get you an accurate map for your exact setup unless he's dyno-tuned a bike exactly like yours. You do need to hash this out, though, as the map you're using now will undoubtedly not be optimal once the cams are installed.
I'm sure you're right...after more thought, I could probably just get the PC-V from Jamie and have him put a map in it...I know that I will eventually go to a 103 when I get my budget together, I just wanted something that'll give me better performance without spending too much...
 
  #64  
Old 10-15-2009 | 09:26 AM
iclick's Avatar
iclick
Extreme HDF Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 11,615
Likes: 48
From: Baton Rouge, LA
Default

Originally Posted by KaponeWKYA
I know the TD's aren't as good for low end TQ as 2:1, but I didn't think it'd hurt so much that it would negate the 255s...is this correct?
It probably wouldn't negate the effects of the 255's, but I can't see going to the trouble of swapping cams for one that produces an improvement in the low-end and then install something that takes some of it away. That's just me, but it depends on your priorities: Sound, look, or whatever attracts you to the TD's vs. the virtues of the 255's. I'm confident you'll have better performance with the 255's and TD's than stock without TD's, however.

Originally Posted by KaponeWKYA
I'm sure you're right...after more thought, I could probably just get the PC-V from Jamie and have him put a map in it...I know that I will eventually go to a 103 when I get my budget together, I just wanted something that'll give me better performance without spending too much...
I think going with 255's first and deciding on how it works for you is a good idea. If you want more just add the 103 jugs and pistons and you have a Stage II, which when tuned produces a very nice TQ curve based on what I've seen.
 
  #65  
Old 10-15-2009 | 01:04 PM
dirtdobber's Avatar
dirtdobber
Elite HDF Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,749
Likes: 15
From: sand mountain Alabama
Default

I also add the SE 255's first. I have considered ,going to 103. Not real sure as I am happy with just the cams right now.
However, you can not get just the pistons and cylinders. Thats not really not much of a problem, I will bore any way.
I had the fp 2490 map in mine before going to the pcv. The pcv map that fuelmoto installed for me is really close. The pcv is better, runs cooler, cranks easier after warm, smoother running. My mpg went up.
I like it better than the fuelpak.
Nothing wrong with he fuelpak if they have a programed/tested, the 2490 map is not for 96ci/se255 cams. It works good but not designed for the 96/255 set up
True duals will cost some low end but with the se 255 cams you will not notice it much.
The slip on's can either help or hurt depending on the back pressure.
I am using Se 64895-07a's

dd

In God we Trust

Iclick, I finally got a laptop so I can send you the map now.
As soon as it warms up enough to do it.
getting old you know
 

Last edited by dirtdobber; 10-15-2009 at 01:07 PM.
  #66  
Old 10-15-2009 | 01:30 PM
iclick's Avatar
iclick
Extreme HDF Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 11,615
Likes: 48
From: Baton Rouge, LA
Default

Originally Posted by dirtdobber
I also add the SE 255's first. I have considered ,going to 103. Not real sure as I am happy with just the cams right now. However, you can not get just the pistons and cylinders.
Can't you get 16546-99 (jugs) and 22851-99A (flat-tops) separately?

...I will bore any way.
If I were to do the BB kit I would bore my stock cylinders too. No use wasting them.

Iclick, I finally got a laptop so I can send you the map now.
As soon as it warms up enough to do it. getting old you know
Send it on over when you get it.
 
  #67  
Old 10-15-2009 | 01:42 PM
KaponeWKYA's Avatar
KaponeWKYA
Tourer
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 474
Likes: 3
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

Thanks iClick and DirtDobber...I know I want to eventually put a strong 103 kit in here, matter of fact, I've already priced it out with Bennett's Performance here in SoCal, but I don't have $4,200 (give/take) to do it. Also, I am considering the TD's because I already have the Monster Ovals and I really like them and don't want to go in a different direction just yet. I know I'll lose some of the TQ benefit, but I figure the 255s, PC-V, and TDs is a reasonable compromise for the time being. I love this forum because it provides an opportunity to bounce ideas off others that can keep you from making costly mistakes--thanks again!
 
  #68  
Old 10-15-2009 | 02:11 PM
PTAG's Avatar
PTAG
Road Captain
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 558
Likes: 2
From: Richardson, Tx
Default

Originally Posted by cmashark
Shoot, I wish I could get closer to 50.... A buddy of mine has a relatively stock 07 Ultra and he says his best was 52 mpg on one of his trips to NY...
I wish I could get that kind of milage. I have just been getting 39 with the 103/255 cams, but I can't seem to keep it below 85 on the freeway which may be some of the problem. Glad you're having fun. That's what it's all about.
 
  #69  
Old 10-15-2009 | 06:21 PM
jag1886's Avatar
jag1886
Elite HDF Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,085
Likes: 11
From: Boise Idaho
Default

Originally Posted by TheWhitedogg
Close to 100 ftlbs is pretty easy to obtain with the 255's. If you can pick up a set used on ebay this is the best low budget build you can do yourself.
There you go a side by side comparison of the 2.
 
Attached Thumbnails Ride report...after 255 install on 96 incher-copy-of-dsc02572.jpg  
  #70  
Old 10-15-2009 | 06:31 PM
cmashark's Avatar
cmashark
Thread Starter
|
Road Warrior
Veteran: Navy
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,496
Likes: 209
From: Atoka, TN
Default

Originally Posted by jag1886
There you go a side by side comparison of the 2.
It would be nice to know the stats behind the blue and red line.... pipes? stage 1? which slip ons? I take it that one line is the 255 and the other is 204's?

Chris
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bowhunter61
Touring Models
13
02-14-2019 02:48 PM
D W K
Touring Models
18
11-27-2015 07:53 PM
Dave54
Dyna Glide Models
6
03-12-2009 06:57 PM
Garemlin
Touring Models
10
03-08-2009 08:47 PM
shortleg
Touring Models
13
09-01-2007 10:32 PM



Quick Reply: Ride report...after 255 install on 96 incher



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:20 PM.