Touring Models Road King, Road King Custom, Road King Classic, Road Glide, Street Glide, Electra Glide, Electra Glide Classic, and Electra Glide Ultra Classic bikes.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Would you build a 95' or a 98' engine for a 03 Road King?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 12-11-2008 | 08:35 PM
jrhd1's Avatar
jrhd1
Thread Starter
|
Cruiser
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, Ohio
Default Would you build a 95' or a 98' engine for a 03 Road King?

I am looking to build the engine in my 03 Road King. I was thinking about building a 98'. But, after talking to a couple engine builders, I am not sure what to do. Some of the shops told me a 98' would be fine and others said that boreing out for the 98 makes the wall to thin in the jugs. So with that, the said I should stick to a 95' build.

Please, let me know what you would do and who you would deal with....Thanks!
 
  #2  
Old 12-11-2008 | 08:56 PM
timberland's Avatar
timberland
Road Master
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,117
Likes: 4
From: Log home in SE Michigan full time. Log cabin in east TN, Smoky Mountians part time
Default

I did it and would do it again. Actually 97.####'s Bought Weisco pistons and bored the stock cylinders. So you can't bore them again, big deal. They are on ebay every day std bore for $30-$40 a pair. I had built a 110 plus HP and TQ engine for my 2002 FXDWG3, Daytona twin tech ignition, Woods tw9g cams, Jims roller rockers, 10.5/1 pistons, ported heads, 2 inch intake valves, Mikuni 45mm carb, Jagg oil cooler, best premium fuel you can buy......NEVER did it spark knock. Definately do it again if I had a TC88. Now I have a TC96 in a SG...it will be a 103 plus .020 ...103.####'s big as it can be without case boring.
 
  #3  
Old 12-11-2008 | 09:19 PM
bikergeoff's Avatar
bikergeoff
Road Master
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 1
From: Just South of Detroit, MI
Default

I don't know how many miles you've got on that 03, but are you planning on doing anything to the bottom end? If so, talk to a builder who deals with S&S. They make a 106 inch stroker kit that's pretty wicked. 4 1/2 inch stroke, so the motor doesn't have too much vibration and will last a long time.
 
  #4  
Old 12-11-2008 | 09:22 PM
hollywoodultra's Avatar
hollywoodultra
Tourer
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
Default

I was in your same shoes about a week ago. 98 or 95 and after speaking with my indy, steve at gmr and kevin at hq's, I decided to stay with the 95.

after listening to everyones info I came to the conclusion that the 98 is great about 5% more increase in hp and tq. The one thing that stayed in my mind the whole time was that the 98 being pushed to the limits on boring would leave a little "wondering", is something going to happen if it were to get over heated etc.

I just didn't want the "wondering" to be on my mind while I was sitting in traffic or on mainstreet in Sturgis. So I am going with a 95, the little more gain for the 98 was not worth it for me. JMO

Whatever you decide to build go with it and dont look back!! Good luck

I am sure that others will chime in, if you have not yet speak to steve at gmr and kevin at hq's they are walking books of knowledge, they are there to help.
 
  #5  
Old 12-11-2008 | 10:09 PM
Lucky 13's Avatar
Lucky 13
Road Master
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 752
Likes: 0
From: North East, Florida
Default

I went with the 95" and love it but I'm sure you like the 98" just as much. My gas mileage is the same as when it was an 88", 43 MPG.
 
  #6  
Old 12-11-2008 | 10:19 PM
glide2005's Avatar
glide2005
Supporter
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,196
Likes: 9
From: Shenandoah, TX
Default

Just rode mine home tonight.Had a 98" done with head work,S&S 510 cam and gear drive.It's not broke in yet. Only a 100 miles on it.My indy did prelim on the dyno to get a base line.69 hp stock now 93hp 70 lb tq stock now 102 lb tq.Can't wait till its broke in and final dyno and tuned. Should see 97 hp and 107 or110 lb tq. Now that will get your attention.Thats with true duals,if I had 2 to 1's the numbers would be even higher .
 
  #7  
Old 12-12-2008 | 08:08 AM
1flhtk4me's Avatar
1flhtk4me
Seasoned HDF Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 10,670
Likes: 91
From: Billings,Mt.
Default

Originally Posted by Lucky 13
I went with the 95" and love it but I'm sure you like the 98" just as much. My gas mileage is the same as when it was an 88", 43 MPG.
I also went with a 95".Runs great and the gas mileage increased from 42 to 45.I had mine built for a daily commuter,not too radical.
 
  #8  
Old 12-12-2008 | 04:07 PM
meepers's Avatar
meepers
Tourer
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 369
Likes: 1
From: Land of the sunstroke
Default

Im building a 95 twin cam for my Evo motored bike. after all the research I did, I decided against the 103/110/117 route. From what I have seen, 95 is the best compromise, increased performance at real world rpms, much better reliability then going bigger, less heat issues then the 96, There are a few builders that I have seen that are getting 100+ numbers with strong midrange grunt. I occasionally romp the bike on around town rides, but for the most part, I put my bike together for long, out of state rides and reliability is a must.
 
  #9  
Old 12-12-2008 | 05:13 PM
olgreydog7's Avatar
olgreydog7
Road Captain
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
From:
Default

First, what are your goals for the bike? Do you want high hp or torque? Will you be riding alot of two up? Do you tour or just bar hop? If you just want some extra torque, do you even need to go big bore? There have been some excellent 88" builds that have made close to 100 ftlbs. A stroker will really wake up the torque across the rpm range. 95" is easy as you can get kts that are balanced matched so all you have to do is swap pistons and bore the cylinders. Also realize that 100 hp/ftlbs is alot on such a light vehicle.
 
  #10  
Old 05-27-2024 | 04:04 AM
Roadking23's Avatar
Roadking23
Stage II
Joined: May 2024
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
From: Indiana
Default

Originally Posted by meepers
Im building a 95 twin cam for my Evo motored bike. after all the research I did, I decided against the 103/110/117 route. From what I have seen, 95 is the best compromise, increased performance at real world rpms, much better reliability then going bigger, less heat issues then the 96, There are a few builders that I have seen that are getting 100+ numbers with strong midrange grunt. I occasionally romp the bike on around town rides, but for the most part, I put my bike together for long, out of state rides and reliability is a must.
I have a 06 road king with a screaming eagle 95 inch motor the bike has 97,000 miles on it with a tuner, my buddy has a soft tail custom with a S*S motor and he has to get a good hole shot to even stay with me, and im not kidding when I say I can under hard acceleration i can left the front wheel when grabbing 2nd gear, increased rear tire to a 180, motor still breaks it loose on command,, and everybody likes the deep tone the bike has,, so I'm huge fan of the 95 inch motor, and I confess the fuel mileage isn't the best, but for a performance bagger im happy.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MOSTWANTED
Engine Mechanical Topics
12
11-07-2014 01:23 PM
harleyhogdude
Exhaust System Topics
22
10-25-2010 03:40 PM
cmashark
Touring Models
37
09-20-2009 10:56 AM
jrhd1
Exhaust System Topics
11
12-12-2008 11:41 PM
jrhd1
Exhaust System Topics
12
09-03-2008 07:50 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:10 PM.