Touring Models Road King, Road King Custom, Road King Classic, Road Glide, Street Glide, Electra Glide, Electra Glide Classic, and Electra Glide Ultra Classic bikes.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

PCIII or Sert, and WHY

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 10-08-2008, 10:40 PM
mattman22033's Avatar
mattman22033
mattman22033 is offline
Road Warrior
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 1,373
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hogbag07
Warranty with sert no warranty with pc111
Also that would be no warranty with a T-max, V&H fuel pak, etc.

The dealers want you to believe that the SERT doesn't void the warranty so you will buy HDs product.

For instance...you have your SERT tuned by an indy and then there is some engine problems caused by the ECM or some other fuel issue. Think HD will honor the warranty.

Unfortunately dealers hold too much power over the factory warranty and they can deny anything for any reason.
 
  #12  
Old 10-08-2008, 11:44 PM
Glyde's Avatar
Glyde
Glyde is offline
Road Master
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Gilbert, AZ.
Posts: 840
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

PCIII works great and provides the same result as SEST at a fraction of the price. As for bypassing the 02 sensors it really doesn't matter. 02 sensors only measure whats happened AFTER combustion whereas the primary goal of fuel mgmt is to provide the optimum fuel/air mix before combustion.

Do the math:

PCIII $279 + indy dyno tune $200 = $479
SEST $599 + dealer dyno tune $300 = $899

In the end you've accomplished the same thing.

My .02 cents.
 
  #13  
Old 10-09-2008, 12:58 AM
Cryptoboy's Avatar
Cryptoboy
Cryptoboy is offline
Seasoned HDF Member

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Murfreesboro , TN
Posts: 7,090
Received 3,878 Likes on 1,415 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bacon
I own an 08 Ultra Classic, and I was wondering what you all recommend, a PCIII or a SERT, and why. I narrowed down to these two choices as they are the predominant fuel management devices I hear of people using. I know a lot of people say "why go with a PCIII when it bypasses the o2 sensors", but is this really a concern? Your feedback please.
I can't really comment on an 08, as my bike is an 05, but the main benefit to having a SERT over an PCIII is flexibility. (That goes the same for the V&H FuelPak and others). The SERT has the most minute fine tuning for the fuel management. The PCIII - which I have - has excellent fine tuning, but not quite as comprehensive as the SERT.

It all comes down to how you ride. If you want to squeeze every last bit of power out of your bike (i.e. big motor, etc.) then the SERT is worth the money. If you just want your bike to run better with light mods (pipes, a/c, maybe a slight increase in cubes), but don't want to spend alot of time tuning and fine tuning it, then the PCIII or the others will do just fine.
 
  #14  
Old 10-09-2008, 01:39 AM
Trek's Avatar
Trek
Trek is offline
Tourer
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Spokane Valley, Washington State
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I've run the fuel paks, power commanders, and the dealer "downloads."

My best experience has come from owing the TTS tuner mentioned earlier. It flashes the stock ECM, keeps the O2 sensors online, doesn't void the warrantee and you don't need to get a dyno run to tune your bike. And if you can reflash the stock ECM with the orginal map if you need to. The TTS tuner will also adapt to whatever future mods you might want to make. My bike runs perfectly though I am now thinking of doing an engine build of sorts. Good part about that is that I won't have to buy another tuner or pay for another dyno run if I do an upgrade.

IMHO it is the best tuner out there.
 
  #15  
Old 10-09-2008, 07:27 AM
hoosierhog88's Avatar
hoosierhog88
hoosierhog88 is offline
Road Warrior
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Contributor to HDForums.com
Posts: 1,551
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Having done tons of investigation into this subject, I'll toss in my .02 cents worth.

I went with a SERT for the following reasons:

I didn't want a third party "box" hanging on my bike as a possible single point of failure. I have 4 riding buds that had PCIII's and 3 of them have had problems and had to disconnect the PCIII alongside the road in order to get their bikes running. The SERT/SEST reprograms the ECM on the bike, thus no device to break down.

I got a heck of a deal on the SERT. 20% off at the dealer if they do the install, plus free dyno tune with the purchase of a SERT. 20% off the SE/AC too. I got the entire package done for about $550.00. Yes, this is more than a PCIII, but I spent over $22k for a motorcycle, I wasn't about to buy something just because it was cheaper than the SERT.

Excellent DYNO tuner... my dealership is known by riders in several states as being a high quality dealer that has several techs that are well trained in dyno tuning. Well worth the effort to get there, imho.
 
  #16  
Old 10-09-2008, 08:09 AM
Windup08's Avatar
Windup08
Windup08 is offline
Road Warrior
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,314
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

I also went with the SERT partly for the flexibility of using it for future upgrades, but mostly like hoosierhog88 said, I didn't want another device hanging on my bike and creating another possible point of failure. The downside of the SERT is that once its used on your bike it can't be used on any other because it marries itself to the ECU. That being said which ever you choose you can't beat the results of a good dyno tune.
 
  #17  
Old 10-09-2008, 08:48 AM
beary's Avatar
beary
beary is offline
Grand HDF Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Edmond Oklahoma
Posts: 4,929
Received 283 Likes on 188 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Cryptoboy
I can't really comment on an 08, as my bike is an 05, but the main benefit to having a SERT over an PCIII is flexibility. (That goes the same for the V&H FuelPak and others). The SERT has the most minute fine tuning for the fuel management. The PCIII - which I have - has excellent fine tuning, but not quite as comprehensive as the SERT.

It all comes down to how you ride. If you want to squeeze every last bit of power out of your bike (i.e. big motor, etc.) then the SERT is worth the money. If you just want your bike to run better with light mods (pipes, a/c, maybe a slight increase in cubes), but don't want to spend alot of time tuning and fine tuning it, then the PCIII or the others will do just fine.

This is the best explination about on this subject I've read. The problem I have found with these discussions are that it is hard to understand the differences between SERTs, downloads and third party boxes without seeing these things in person. As for spending the extra money because it is a $22000 bike, the way I look at it is any improvement over stock is worth the money whether that is $20 or $2000. So I think we want to understand the difference between the cheapest compared to the more expensive options. As Crypto says, it really comes down to the type of riding you want.

This has been a very imformative discussion. Thanks to all.

Beary
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Zimbob
Touring Models
12
04-22-2008 03:38 PM
jad
Ignition/Tuner/ECM/Fuel Injection
2
11-14-2007 06:59 AM
aj
Touring Models
24
03-29-2007 02:39 PM
MrDeicerMan
Ignition/Tuner/ECM/Fuel Injection
2
03-25-2007 07:41 PM
bonscottie
Ignition/Tuner/ECM/Fuel Injection
12
03-19-2007 09:53 AM



Quick Reply: PCIII or Sert, and WHY



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:26 PM.