Touring Models Road King, Road King Custom, Road King Classic, Road Glide, Street Glide, Electra Glide, Electra Glide Classic, and Electra Glide Ultra Classic bikes.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

DYNO Numbers for Baggers???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #4421  
Old 03-15-2014, 07:54 PM
EdandGrace's Avatar
EdandGrace
EdandGrace is offline
Tourer
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Iowa City, Iowa
Posts: 384
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

 DYNO Numbers for Baggers???-unnamed.jpg

13 SG, street legal SE stage 4, Rush true dual with Big Louie 2.25 baffles. SEPST.
 
  #4422  
Old 03-16-2014, 07:24 AM
2010 ultra man's Avatar
2010 ultra man
2010 ultra man is offline
Tourer
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default 117" Fuel-Moto Sport build

I rode home on my 2010 FLHTK after I had a Fuel-Moto 117" sport motor installed. Insane power!!! The rear tire is bald so I didn't rip on it too bad,but O.M.G. man, that ride was almost as fun as getting laid by hot twin sisters! The Power-Vision is a must have in my book,it's nice to see what gear you are in, engine temperature,etc...the list goes on what you can do with it.I had the F.M. 107" before. I put 12,000 miles on it and it ran great.I will post after I install the new rear tire(in progress).Ride safe.
 
Attached Thumbnails  DYNO Numbers for Baggers???-117-dyno-sheet.jpg  
  #4423  
Old 03-16-2014, 09:11 AM
Vic hale's Avatar
Vic hale
Vic hale is offline
Cruiser
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Cedar Rapids
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Coughs on take off so have to take it back for more tuning but this is what I have and all I can say is its scary in first gear. It pulls the front wheel with me but with my son that weighs 30 lbs lighter just cracking it from a roll it spins the back tire with him. I couldn't imagine having more power.
the bottom line is when it was a 96 CI with 555 cams
 
Attached Thumbnails  DYNO Numbers for Baggers???-1975124_10200713708565021_639284443_n-1-.jpg  

Last edited by Vic hale; 03-16-2014 at 09:12 AM. Reason: forgot the red line.
  #4424  
Old 03-17-2014, 07:58 PM
hardcorpusmc's Avatar
hardcorpusmc
hardcorpusmc is offline
Stage I
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

2013 FLHRC 254E cams, heavy breather intake, V&H power duels, 4" street cannons, dyno cam out at 90.36 HP/ 104.56 TQ
 
  #4425  
Old 03-18-2014, 10:35 AM
fuelmoto's Avatar
fuelmoto
fuelmoto is online now
Platinum Sponsor
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Little Chute, WI
Posts: 7,236
Received 4,159 Likes on 1,353 Posts
Default

Here is a build we just finished up, from our facebook newsfeeds https://www.facebook.com/FuelMoto

147Hp/148Tq: finished up Pat's custom Fuel Moto hi output 117 build. This motor was set up at 11.5 comp, Wood TW-9BG gear drive cams, FM/Gary Williams hybrid heads, 58MM TB, Jackpot 2/1 exhaust, dyno tuned with Dynojet Power Vision. This fully specd motor is an extremely strong runner, 120+ torque from 2300-6300 RPM.



 
__________________


Jamie Long / Fuel Moto USA
The USA's Leader V-Twin EFI & Performance www.fuelmotousa.com
Contact 920-423-3309
Email jamie@fuelmotousa.com










  #4426  
Old 03-18-2014, 10:42 AM
grbrown's Avatar
grbrown
grbrown is offline
Club Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bedford UK
Posts: 45,429
Received 2,866 Likes on 2,429 Posts
Thumbs up

Jamie, a superb set of curves - well done! Now if only......
 
  #4427  
Old 03-18-2014, 11:00 AM
BrianSF-GA's Avatar
BrianSF-GA
BrianSF-GA is offline
Road Master
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Cartersville, Georgia
Posts: 771
Received 15 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 738drvr
Look up the video on YouTube. Bike went a 10.96. Still extremely quick for a RK but definitely not a low 10. If Goerge would work on the launch and putting the power to the ground, then he might get a low ten. That bike is very heavy. I would love to put that engine in a FX frame with a Buell front-end to see what it would do. Should run a high 8 in that chassis. Engine makes 200HP. Wow.
Who said low "low 10" ... I said mid-10. Sorry, but I have slept since June of 2012.

Now that "we" are splitting hairs", it was a 10.91 "definitely not a" 10.96 ... !

For a Harley touring, bagger it was a pretty damn badass pass was my initial point.
 
  #4428  
Old 03-18-2014, 06:05 PM
bigdriver4u's Avatar
bigdriver4u
bigdriver4u is offline
Novice
Join Date: May 2012
Location: FL
Posts: 22
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Welp, my little 2006 Road King custom was just dyno'ed with Max Torque=107.21, Max Power=100.08. Not bad for an original 88. She's had 26k original miles before the upgrade.

List:
95 in bore
Heads cleaned (Tachyon Machine shop Jax Fl)
True Duals w/Vance Hines Hi Outputs
Screaming Eagle 211 cams
Screaming Eagle Hydro cam plate/oil pump
Screaming Eagle lifters
Screaming Eagle Big Sucker
 
  #4429  
Old 03-20-2014, 07:35 PM
rick2800's Avatar
rick2800
rick2800 is offline
Tourer
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 463
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Just got my bike back from a second tune at a different dealer. The first tune came out at 80hp and 103 tq. My bike has the 103 bb kit cnc pro port heads se255 cams and cam plate on the first tune it had Vance & hines big shots. I decided to put MGS true duals on and have tuned by someone else due to the original tuner not liking the fact that I built the motor and telling me the 80hp is all it had. I put the new pipes on and took the bike to Bowling Green HD told them what was in the bike but didnt tell them the other tune results till today. They called the bike was done made 99.75hp and 118.45 ftlbs tq. Needless to say I am happy. My question is the first tune had sae smoothing the new sheet says std smoothing. Whats the difference?
 
  #4430  
Old 03-21-2014, 12:04 AM
Joker65's Avatar
Joker65
Joker65 is offline
Road Captain
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 742
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Well, Std v. SAE smoothing has to do with correcting for atmospheric conditions. In general, SAE is typically considered the best for comparing tunes between different Dyno's. With regards to your numbers, Std is approx. 3% higher than SAE numbers.

(That's the short version; I'm sure someone else will explain in greater detail.)
 


Quick Reply: DYNO Numbers for Baggers???



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:13 PM.