Sundowner vs Aftermarket
#1
06-29-2007 | 09:02 AM
Thread Starter
|
Cruiser
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
From: Windsor
#2
06-29-2007 | 09:05 AM
Road Captain
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 527
Likes: 3
From: Columbus GA / Phenix City AL
RE: Sundowner vs Aftermarket
I tried the Sundowner when I bought my RKC and didn't care for it that much...it spread my legs too far apart to get both feet solidly on the ground (short legs, I guess). I ended up with the Reach seat. Guess I might be a special case, though. I've got about a 30 in inseam.
#3
06-29-2007 | 12:40 PM
Cruiser
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
From: McHenry Illinois
#4
06-29-2007 | 12:54 PM
Road Master
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 856
Likes: 6
From: Dutchess County NY
RE: Sundowner vs Aftermarket
I bought a Mustang for my Sportster and liked it so much I ordered one for my Super Glide before I even picked the bike up. There is a huge difference in the quality between the Mustang and Sundowner, the Sundowner looks like a piece of sh_t by comparison. Like anything else quality costs more but is well worth it. When I took my Sportster in for service everyone in the service dept was checking out my seat and the service manager told me that it was a much nicer seat than anything Harley sells.
#5
06-29-2007 | 01:14 PM
Intermediate
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
From:
#6
06-29-2007 | 01:16 PM
Elite HDF Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,515
Likes: 6
From:
RE: Sundowner vs Aftermarket
ORIGINAL: davidc
I bought a Mustang for my Sportster and liked it so much I ordered one for my Super Glide before I even picked the bike up. There is a huge difference in the quality between the Mustang and Sundowner, the Sundowner looks like a piece of sh_t by comparison. Like anything else quality costs more but is well worth it. When I took my Sportster in for service everyone in the service dept was checking out my seat and the service manager told me that it was a much nicer seat than anything Harley sells.
I bought a Mustang for my Sportster and liked it so much I ordered one for my Super Glide before I even picked the bike up. There is a huge difference in the quality between the Mustang and Sundowner, the Sundowner looks like a piece of sh_t by comparison. Like anything else quality costs more but is well worth it. When I took my Sportster in for service everyone in the service dept was checking out my seat and the service manager told me that it was a much nicer seat than anything Harley sells.
#7
06-29-2007 | 09:41 PM
Advanced
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
From: Plano, TX
RE: Sundowner vs Aftermarket
I bought the sundowner about two weeks ago. I've been able to ride about 10 hours since the purchase. I'm in north Texas and it has been monsoon season for three weeks. I found the seat a little wider than stock, but I can get my feet on the ground with 28" inseam. It is far superior to the stock seat. I tried the Reach seat and it killed my back.
Trending Topics
#8
06-29-2007 | 10:31 PM
Cruiser
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
From: Wickenburg Arizona
RE: Sundowner vs Aftermarket
I have had a mustang seat on my Ultra and did not like how hard it was or the the fact it raises you up by about an inch or so. I went with the sundowner and think it is great. just did a 600 mile ride last Sunday and the only part of me that was not tired was my ****. Sundowner seat is great!
#10
06-30-2007 | 06:58 AM
Road Warrior
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,379
Likes: 2
From: Central, NY
RE: Sundowner vs Aftermarket
I have 23K on my Sundowner in 2 years, including700+ mile days. It was very comfortable until this season, when the foam in the center of both seats apparently began to break down (compress). One of the dealers confirmed this as anissue with the Sundowner. I bought gel pads and sheepskin covers and it's fine again.
I'm not knocking this seat at all, but be aware of this as a possible issue.
I'm not knocking this seat at all, but be aware of this as a possible issue.