Performance baggers
#891
#892
#895
The following users liked this post:
aroacha5446 (08-24-2020)
#897
Totally get it. You'd be good with 13" rears and a long pipe. My buddy has 13's and a long pipe and he carves the **** outta these Cali mountains without issues. I may be wrong and someone chime in if I am, but the issue you'd probably have is with a passenger hitting a big bump or pot hole. But even then youd probably be good. IMO its probably the guys that go super low that would probably have issues but then again I may be wrong. Just makes sense to me with how bikes ride and handle. Im certainly no professional.
#898
The following users liked this post:
aroacha5446 (08-25-2020)
#899
With that being said I THINK it depends if you have an m8 or twin cam.
I THINK m8 needs short pipe anything longer than 13.5" and twin cam needs it after 14"...swing arm will hit the trans....but again, I could very well have those measurements and years mixed up.
I went to 13's on my 08 and my 18, both with long pipes and no issues. That much I do know. I dont think I'd go +2 with anything under 14", maybe 14.5"....I'm too short for that lol. But I do love my 13"s
The following users liked this post:
aroacha5446 (08-24-2020)
#900
I was wondering because most of the pics of bikes with a higher suspension setup seem to all run the shorter pipe.
CRTMAN21 thanks for the input I will most likely run the 13's in the rear. Who knows for up front
GLOCK35 What Legend setup lengths are you running? I like your stance.
CRTMAN21 thanks for the input I will most likely run the 13's in the rear. Who knows for up front
GLOCK35 What Legend setup lengths are you running? I like your stance.
Last edited by aroacha5446; 08-25-2020 at 09:08 AM.