1.725:1 rockers
#11
10-30-2017, 07:09 AM
On my last bike I had 204 cams with 1.725 rocker arms on stock 103.
it was a blast,26 to 28 thousands rpm is where they come in and they do like gang busters.
still pulled good down low,don’t think I lost anything at all there.
my dyno was 96 horsepower and 114 ft lbs of torque.
and they sounded wicked,I was running a 2/1/2 header pipe and jackpots with competition baffles.
it was a blast,26 to 28 thousands rpm is where they come in and they do like gang busters.
still pulled good down low,don’t think I lost anything at all there.
my dyno was 96 horsepower and 114 ft lbs of torque.
and they sounded wicked,I was running a 2/1/2 header pipe and jackpots with competition baffles.
#12
10-30-2017, 07:09 AM
#14
11-04-2017, 01:07 AM
Banned
I've read some of the buzz on high lift rockers, is there any empirical evidence to suggest it make any or a universal improvement? Or is it just hit and miss?
In respect to other engines, it seems to me the amounts of changes in "or ° we are talking about are very modest.
In respect to other engines, it seems to me the amounts of changes in "or ° we are talking about are very modest.
Last edited by Wodan; 11-04-2017 at 01:10 AM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post