So you must drive a Tucker........ j/k

 

Good one! That headlight is usually going in the OPPOSITE direction of the turn because we countersteer in curves. Makes a nice big flashlight if you lose your keys or something, though.

 

The windshield on the RG is further away from the rider (roomier) which may produce more wind buffeting, but it depends on theheight of the windshield and your height. Tall riders (Over 5' 10") may want to purchase a taller windshield.

There is no doubt that the frame mounted fairing is better for handling, however. Better in the crosswinds and the steering is lighter and more nimble.

As for wanting the headlight to point where you are going -- when your leaning it does. Who looks at the fairing while driving though? I've heard this argument before - my father bought a EG for this reason. Don't agree with it, but to each his own Harley!!

[sm=happybounce.gif]

 

lol, ok so next time yer out at nite and wanna make a left turn at anything over say....20mph....crank yer bars hard to the left so ya can "see where yer goin" and see where ya end up........j/k please don't do that

 

I rented both bikes (RG, SG) on the same day. At the end of the day I went with the RG. I wanted the SG at first but after riding the RG, I went with the RG. I am 5’10” tall and weigh 200 lbs. I have been a licensed rider since 1984. Most of my riding has been on sport bikes till 2002. My first HD was a 2003 Deuce that I still have that I bought new in Aug. 2002.

The RG in my opinion handles better and has a softer ride then the SG. Driving on the freeway the batwing fairing of the SG would cause the bike to want to move to the left or right when passing big rigs or encountering a cross wind. This was not a major concern or a deal breaker but it was present. I did not experience this on the RG. The small windscreen on the SG caused my helmet to be moved all around while driving on the freeway. It was not apparent when driving below 40 mph. The tall windscreen on the RG protected my helmet from the wind. The stock seat on the RG for me was comfortable. The SG seat felt too hard and it would be the first thing I changed. I liked the fact that the RG came with cruise control and the SG did not.

I have to say that I think that the SG is a better-looking bike. The RG fairing has grown on me. But my thoughts on the RG fairing disappear as soon as I start riding. Plus I like the color of fire red pearl and the SG does not come in that color.

I am glad that I did the rental. If I didn’t I would have purchased the SG on looks alone. They are both great bikes and there is no denying that the SG is great looking bike.

My recommendation is to rent both bikes and make your decision. Good luck.


[IMG]local://upfiles/16051/31979A67592C47CDB18CFB24F4EFCCD9.jpg[/IMG]

 

Agree... Rent then both for a WEEK-END and drive all types of roads.... Then pick the one that fits your needs the best!!!

I bought a new Road Glide because it just handled better then any Touring HD I have riden... No additional weight on the bars (frame mounted fairing) makes the steering easier...

 

My current bike is a SG, like it a lot with no complaints, but the RGs are starting to get my attention, so much so that my next bike may be a RG.

The blacked out engine that the RG does not have is not as important to me as it use to be. When I purchased my current SG, I was also considering a RG but the blacked out engine on the SG was a major factor of me picking a SG over the RG.

 

The same two that I had in mind I went with the roadie. I looove it!

 

I thought the SG was a stiff ride, went with the EG...Just couldn't swallow the looks of the 70's style Vetter fairing. BUT, now the more I look at them, the more it's kinda growing on me.

 

For me, it was the Road Glide...