What makes gear cams so much better?
#11
Way back when, crank runout tolerances were much tighter than what was allowed more recently. The only way to know is to check it. Too much runout and the gears will destroy each other. Cam chain gears don't mesh therefore don't require such close tolerances, therefore are cheaper for the MoCo to produce.
#12
#15
Indeed! I've ridden shovels and Evos since the '70s and Sportsters and Buells a bit less. The Sporty-based engines have countless gears in the cam chest and don't intrude while riding.
#17
A local indy I've dealt with had an interesting demonstration setup in his shop. He had two cam chests set up, one with a gear drive and one with the original chain drive. Each had a small hand crank on it for folks to turn. The amount of force required to turn the chain drive setup was huge compared to the gears. All the tensioner pressure on the chain really puts a load on the system.
#18
#19
Are you two following each other around Canada?!
Good points from both of you. As an engineer I've taken a keen interest in what the auto/bike industry has been doing in recent years to reduce noise and exhaust emissions, which includes reducing parasitic losses. It seems the additional power required to turn the cam tensioners must have been considered worth it, presumably for the reduced noise.
Good points from both of you. As an engineer I've taken a keen interest in what the auto/bike industry has been doing in recent years to reduce noise and exhaust emissions, which includes reducing parasitic losses. It seems the additional power required to turn the cam tensioners must have been considered worth it, presumably for the reduced noise.
#20