Touring Models Road King, Road King Custom, Road King Classic, Road Glide, Street Glide, Electra Glide, Electra Glide Classic, and Electra Glide Ultra Classic bikes.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

2017 Milwaukee Eight dyno testing & information

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #791  
Old 11-09-2017 | 02:43 PM
fuelmoto's Avatar
fuelmoto
Thread Starter
|
Platinum Sponsor
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,252
Likes: 4,173
From: Little Chute, WI
Default

We've been dyno testing and writing calibrations for the 2018 CVO Limited over the past week. Here is a dyno chart that compares the completely stock 117" engine, the FM Improved Stock Power Vision tune, and with the addition of Jackpot Hi Roller mufflers.

 
__________________


Jamie Long / Fuel Moto USA
The USA's Leader V-Twin EFI & Performance www.fuelmotousa.com
Contact 920-423-3309
Email jamie@fuelmotousa.com










  #792  
Old 11-10-2017 | 08:53 AM
not_so_newb's Avatar
not_so_newb
Elite HDF Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,922
Likes: 824
From: Toronto Canada
Default

looks like less than 5% HP increase and about 7% torque . looks like the CVO is pretty well set up right off the showroom floor , which , considering what they cost , you kind of hope for !
so the reasons for going to the Jackpots and PV tune are ?

1) rev limiter moved from 5150 rpm to 6250 . not sure how many people use that extra range
2) it runs a little richer and therefore cooler ?
3) the Jackpots sound better ?

anything else ?
 
  #793  
Old 11-10-2017 | 09:01 AM
jmd897's Avatar
jmd897
Banned
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 216
Likes: 24
From: Usa
Default

Originally Posted by not_so_newb
looks like less than 5% HP increase and about 7% torque . looks like the CVO is pretty well set up right off the showroom floor , which , considering what they cost , you kind of hope for !
so the reasons for going to the Jackpots and PV tune are ?

1) rev limiter moved from 5150 rpm to 6250 . not sure how many people use that extra range
2) it runs a little richer and therefore cooler ?
3) the Jackpots sound better ?

anything else ?

it looks almost the same as a 107 with the 222 cam in it. Im sure with some headwork and the right cam that beast will roll with a 130hp/tq +
 
  #794  
Old 11-10-2017 | 09:10 AM
Plow64's Avatar
Plow64
Stellar HDF Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,441
Likes: 158
From: Northern VA
Default

Originally Posted by fuelmoto
We've been dyno testing and writing calibrations for the 2018 CVO Limited over the past week. Here is a dyno chart that compares the completely stock 117" engine, the FM Improved Stock Power Vision tune, and with the addition of Jackpot Hi Roller mufflers.
Do the numbers shown include a high-flow air cleaner kit?

Or does the stock CVO air cleaner flow sufficient air volume, as is?
 
  #795  
Old 11-10-2017 | 09:46 AM
hattitude's Avatar
hattitude
Seasoned HDF Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 11,882
Likes: 8,397
From: San Diego, CA
Default

Looks to me to be a very good result for just a tune & slip-ons....

That added torque is right where you want it, too.

Just goes to show that any bike can be improved by ditching the OEM tune...!
 
  #796  
Old 11-10-2017 | 10:06 AM
fuelmoto's Avatar
fuelmoto
Thread Starter
|
Platinum Sponsor
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,252
Likes: 4,173
From: Little Chute, WI
Default

Originally Posted by Plow64
Do the numbers shown include a high-flow air cleaner kit?

Or does the stock CVO air cleaner flow sufficient air volume, as is?
For this round of testing we retained the stock CVO "Ventilator" air cleaner. We would gain some power by changing it as the element is tiny, we are going to be installing a different cam in this engine and will test a different air cleaner as well.
 
  #797  
Old 11-10-2017 | 11:50 AM
fuelmoto's Avatar
fuelmoto
Thread Starter
|
Platinum Sponsor
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,252
Likes: 4,173
From: Little Chute, WI
Default

Tested the Jackpot M8 2/1/2 head pipe yesterday on the 18 CVO Limited with Jackpot Hi Roller mufflers & Dynojet Power Vision tune. Excellent overall gains, our next test will be a cam swap.



 
  #798  
Old 11-12-2017 | 02:51 PM
pomeara's Avatar
pomeara
Cruiser
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 237
Likes: 25
From: St Louis
Default

I assume you can "feel" 11 additional HP and 13 more torque but is it really noticeable? Can it be measured In terms of additional bike lengths ahead of a stock version?

Probably a dumb question. Trying to determine what the minimum increase in HP /Torque is needed to actually feel a significant difference.

Thanks
 
  #799  
Old 11-12-2017 | 05:11 PM
Plow64's Avatar
Plow64
Stellar HDF Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,441
Likes: 158
From: Northern VA
Default

Originally Posted by pomeara
I assume you can "feel" 11 additional HP and 13 more torque but is it really noticeable? Can it be measured In terms of additional bike lengths ahead of a stock version?

Probably a dumb question. Trying to determine what the minimum increase in HP /Torque is needed to actually feel a significant difference.

Thanks
You would absolutely feel a difference with a gain like that. Definitely noticeable. No question.
 
  #800  
Old 11-12-2017 | 06:34 PM
Goose_NC's Avatar
Goose_NC
Seasoned HDF Member
Veteran: Marine Corp
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 6,296
Likes: 4,908
From: NC
Default

Originally Posted by pomeara
I assume you can "feel" 11 additional HP and 13 more torque but is it really noticeable? Can it be measured In terms of additional bike lengths ahead of a stock version?

Probably a dumb question. Trying to determine what the minimum increase in HP /Torque is needed to actually feel a significant difference.

Thanks
1/4 pound = 1 hp.
 


Quick Reply: 2017 Milwaukee Eight dyno testing & information



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:31 PM.