Major torque down low....not the greatest overall numbers for me. I have crappy TD exhaust. But nevertheless I'm happy with the torque curve and the way it comes on.

 

Good advise. I run it in my SG and for stock comp it cant be beat from 2500-5000 rpm. My TQ curve is perfect to be honest, 100tq at 2600, 100tq at 5100 rpm, peaks at 112. Can't ask for more of a bolt in.

But of those listed it's tough call. OP says 3-5k rpms so not caring if bottom range is a little soft, 555 would be it.

 

I ran the Woods TW 555's in my 11 RK, 96" and VH pro pipe. It did wake the bike up but I didn't realize the full potential of these cams until I bumped it up to a 103" with ported heads and 10.5 compression. I ride 99% 2 up and wanted the power to pass without having to downshift in most cases. The torque really came on around 2800 rpm and pulled hard to almost redline. I now have a 15 Ultra Classic and trying to decide which route I want to go with it to match the performance I had with my RK.

 

57s and a proper tune, but don't expect top performance with your exhaust choice.

 

While we sell Wood cams exclusively, we have many Power Vision maps for Andrews, SE, and other cams and offer unlimited tuning support for these products as well.

 

Thanks Jamie but I still don't know which cam to choose. I wish there was a cam which affects all RPM's instead of just low end, high end.

 

Jamie - 2013 SG - stock motor with screaming eagle burst breather, screaming eagle pro-tuner II, Fuel Moto jackpot mufflers and ceramic x-pipe (decatted). Recommendation on which cam would give me mid-range power and torque? My priority is for the bike to have more power and torque from low-mid range and to give it a good "cam shaft" sound. Thoughts?

 

I too ran the 57's. Damn good cam. You can also use the stock pushrods, so that cuts your cost down in addition to the Andrews cams being alot cheaper than any of the Woods products.

I now run a FM 107 kit with the 777 cams. Alot more top end noise due to the aggressive ramps on the Woods cams. I've always heard the 555 &777 cams like compression.

 

OMG, I just looked at the Dyno chart from FuelMoto website. In a 103, that 777 is a damn beast.


But is that to much for daily riding? I'd love to see a dyno chart, comparing the 777 to the Andrews 57. I'm gonna hit FuelMoto up to see if they have one.

 

How does that thing pull? What exhaust you running?