2015rgs stageIV-Best Mufflers
#1
#2
Ooh. Bad from a performance perspective.
Probably want to go 2-1: Fatcat, Fuel Moto, Supermeg, V&H pro-pipe, etc.
Others will say you could go 2-1-2, but you went with a stage IV presumably because you want the performance, so it makes more sense to go with a 2-1, why throw out any of the ponies you just bought?
Last edited by Keithhu; 09-09-2015 at 03:56 PM.
#4
#5
#6
um, the 2/1 is a real advantage on a smaller framed bike such as a dyna, sporty etc.
the 2/1 will generally help with low end power- but only if the other parts of the motor can take advantage of that.
the 2/1/2 on a touring frame provides a large volume in the exhaust tract and will combine scavenging ( the prime benefit of a 2/1) and allow high volume and high velocity exhaust gas flow at high rpms ( the prime benefit of 2/2 or straight pipes).
a less abrupt advantage in any particular part of the dyno chart..but a general gain at all rpms- less "peaky"
The HD stage 4 kit is designed for the large volume of the 2/1/2 headers and 2 mufflers.
OP I think you'd do well with that.
look at the dyno chart for the stage 4 in the screaming eagle catalog and you'll see potential power peaks at 4000 then falls off
the volume of the tract is important.
an illustration of this might be a dyno chart for a Dyna model vs a Touring model.
Both use the A same motor- the touring model will generally show an even 3 hp increase in power along the charts
the 2/1 is great on a smaller framed bike where the stock exhaust might not have the volume of a touring exhaust.
My FXRP has a 2/1 ( supermeg) for the past 25 years- in conjuction with compression, cam, headwork intake and ignition, the weight and the gearing----this is a pretty quick 80"...but at 5200+ rpms the exhaust is the bottleneck...this is why I have a 15% overdrive
the 2/1 will generally help with low end power- but only if the other parts of the motor can take advantage of that.
the 2/1/2 on a touring frame provides a large volume in the exhaust tract and will combine scavenging ( the prime benefit of a 2/1) and allow high volume and high velocity exhaust gas flow at high rpms ( the prime benefit of 2/2 or straight pipes).
a less abrupt advantage in any particular part of the dyno chart..but a general gain at all rpms- less "peaky"
The HD stage 4 kit is designed for the large volume of the 2/1/2 headers and 2 mufflers.
OP I think you'd do well with that.
look at the dyno chart for the stage 4 in the screaming eagle catalog and you'll see potential power peaks at 4000 then falls off
the volume of the tract is important.
an illustration of this might be a dyno chart for a Dyna model vs a Touring model.
Both use the A same motor- the touring model will generally show an even 3 hp increase in power along the charts
the 2/1 is great on a smaller framed bike where the stock exhaust might not have the volume of a touring exhaust.
My FXRP has a 2/1 ( supermeg) for the past 25 years- in conjuction with compression, cam, headwork intake and ignition, the weight and the gearing----this is a pretty quick 80"...but at 5200+ rpms the exhaust is the bottleneck...this is why I have a 15% overdrive
Last edited by mkguitar; 09-09-2015 at 07:33 PM.
#7
Trending Topics
#8
If you have the true dual style VH head pipe, they are pretty bad performers with your type motor. The Fuel Moto SPC 2-1-2 headpipes are a great performer at a good price for a coated headpipe, but there are others that work well too. I haven't heard anything good about the cfr's regarding performance.
#9
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post